300 Scientists Accuse NOAA of Using Contaminated Data

They claim that NOAA solved the 15-year pause in global warming by “adjusting”  the temperature record from 1998 to 2012, thus suddenly showing more than twice as much warming as other data sets indicate. 

Approximately 300 scientists, engineers, economists, and other climate experts sent a letter to U.S. House Science Committee Chairman Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) in support of his investigation of the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 

They think NOAA scientists may have violated federal laws when they published a 2015 study purporting to eliminate the 15-year “hiatus” in global warming from the temperature record.

“We, the undersigned, scientists, engineers, economists and others, who have looked carefully into the effects of carbon dioxide released by human activities, wish to record our support for the efforts of the Committee on Science, Space and Technology to ensure that federal agencies complied with federal guidelines that implemented the Data Quality Act,” read the letter to Chairman of the House Science Committee, Texas Republican Rep. Lamar Smith.

In June 2015, NOAA issued a report purporting to find Earth had continued to warm during a nearly two-decades-long period when every other data set found a pause or hiatus in rising temperatures.

“In our opinion… NOAA has failed to observe the OMB [Office of Management and Budget] (and its own) guidelines, established in relation to the Data Quality Act.”

The Data Quality Act requires federal agencies like NOAA to “ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information, including statistical information.”

Smith launched an investigation into NOAA’s study last summer over concerns it was pushed out to bolster President Barack Obama’s political agenda. Democrats and the media have largely opposed the probe into NOAA scientists and political appointees, but Smith is determined to continue investigating. NOAA officials surrendered emails to congressional investigators in December.

“Americans are tired of research conducted behind closed doors where they only see cherry-picked conclusions, not the facts,” Smith told The Daily Caller News Foundation. This letter shows that hundreds of respected scientists and experts agree that NOAA’s efforts to alter historical temperature data deserve serious scrutiny.”

The 300 letter signers included 25 climate or atmospheric scientists, 23 geologists, 18 meteorologists, 51 engineers, 74 physicists, 20 chemists and 12 economists. Additionally, 150 signers had doctorates in a related field, one was a Nobel Prize winning physicist and two were astronauts.

NOAA scientists upwardly adjusted temperature readings taken from the engine intakes of ships to eliminate the “hiatus” in global warming from the temperature record.  Those readings are biased by heat absorbed and reflected from ship’s hulls and pouring off engines.

The NOAA study in dispute claims the scientists found a solution to the 15-year “pause” in global warming. They “adjusted” the hiatus in warming the temperature record from 1998 to 2012, the “new analysis exhibits more than twice as much warming as the old analysis at the global scale.” (Italics added)

“As has been acknowledged by numerous scientists, the engine intake data are clearly contaminated by heat conduction from the structure, and as such, never intended for scientific use,” wrote climate scientists Dr. Patrick J. Michaels and Dr. Richard S. Lindzen of the libertarian Cato Institute on the in the science blog Watts Up With That.  (Italics added)

“If we subtract the [old] data from the [new] data… we can see that that is exactly what NOAA did,” climate expert Bob Tisdale and meteorologist Anthony Watts wrote on the same science blog. “It’s the same story all over again; the adjustments go towards cooling the past and thus increasing the slope of temperature rise. Their intent and methods are so obvious they’re laughable.”

300 Scientists Tell Chairman of the House Science Committee: 'we want NOAA to adhere to law of the Data Quality Act'


Thanks to Dean Koehler, Don Brown and Wanda for these links




15 thoughts on “300 Scientists Accuse NOAA of Using Contaminated Data”

  1. It’s so good to see that some elected officials are looking into the massive data tampering going on, and well done to those scientists who stand up and tell the truth.

  2. I find it amazing that they could only find 300 with the guts to say that. It should have been more than 30,000 like the Oregon Petition Project.

    Isn’t it interesting that every alarmist mouthpiece has been found to be lying in one way or another in regard to their data,
    summaries, and conclusions ?

    When will the heavily invested MSM denounce these people as liars ?

    They won’t because they would be explicitly denouncing themselves as liars also.

  3. It is unfortunate that we can no longer believe anything that the Obama administration says. It can be the IRS, DoJ, DHS, EPA and now NASA and NOAA and politics have polluted everyone of them much more than any pollution of the atmosphere by CO2 or and imagined CAGW. A country which can no longer trust its politicians and its scientists is headed for disaster.

    • AGREED!

      I believe how this was done was that anyone in a high-level position who disagreed with Obama’s ideas about this or anything else was simply removed and replaced by some “Czar” to agreed with Obama’s line of thinking.

      The problem is that government works like any other employer… if your supervisor tells you to do something and you don’t do it you can be fired for insubordination. It may be the only way someone in government gets fired.

  4. If they had been reading this web site regularly like the rest of us they would’ve known about this years ago.

  5. the exposures of the dodgy figures n fiddled data dont just make them look like outright agenda driven liars and frauds
    they also look pretty damn pathetic as scientists(used loosely as are their ethics)
    and not the sort of people you’d want to give a job that requires any level of honesty or trust
    and one day , not so far in coming..they will be out of their govvy jobs and in the real world again.
    cant wait!

  6. I’m really pleased to see that some real scientists are fighting back!

    I wonder also if one of the issues is that the Federal government (I work for another agency) has developed a habit of hiring more consultants than permanent people (with the consultants supervised only by their for profit consulting firms).

    There is also an issue where (at least where I work) they hire far more inexperienced “interns” (for example from the ORISE program) than experienced people and then treat those fresh out of school and full of themselves Millennials as “subject matter experts” – with little oversight from more experienced people. I’ve been seeing that for years where I work, with the resulting GIGO.

  7. Human-caused climate change is really a religion and a religion must be protected at all costs and the followers must not question the basis of the religion. They must have faith and blindly follow the high priests.


Comments are closed.