Speculative climate chaos v. indisputable fossil fuel benefits

“Today billions of people enjoy living standards that even kings and queens could not dream of 120 years ago.”
– Paul Driessen and Roger Bezdek


When Oakland, San Francisco and California sued major oil companies for (selling them) oil and natural gas that the litigants now claim are causing warmer seasons, worse weather, rising seas and other climate chaos, they expected a slam dunk – or at least a quick settlement by the defendant companies for billions of dollars. They did not expect the companies would fight back … or that they would get a tech-savvy judge like William Alsup … or that the judge would say they must present actual scientific evidence to back up their manmade climate cataclysm assertions.

They certainly didn’t expect Judge Alsup to tell them they must tally not only the alleged damages from burning oil, natural gas and coal – but also the immense benefits to humanity and Californians from using those fuels for the past 150 years.

To help Judge Alsup – and the litigating attorneys, citizens, politicians and journalists of jurisdictions that are suing oil companies over speculative manmade climate change – Paul Driessen and Roger Bezdek have compiled a concise history, science, health and economics lesson in how fossil fuels have undeniably improved, enhanced, safeguarded and saved countless lives over the past century and a half.


Speculative climate chaos v. indisputable fossil fuel benefits

Federal judge tells climate litigants to tally the numerous blessings from fossil fuels since 1859

Paul Driessen and Roger Bezdek

Judge William Alsup has a BS in engineering, has written computer programs for his ham radio hobby, delves deeply into the technical aspects of numerous cases before him, and even studied other programming languages for a complex Oracle v. Google lawsuit.

As presiding judge in People of the State of California v. BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips and Royal Dutch Shell, he insisted that the litigants present their best scientific evidence for and against the state’s assertion that fossil fuel emissions are causing dangerous climate change. Now he wants to see, not just the alleged damages from burning oil, natural gas and coal – but also the immense benefits to humanity and the people of California from using those fuels for the past 150 years and more.

Environmental and climate activists, including cities pursuing climate lawsuits against oil companies, almost never acknowledge those benefits, which are far-reaching and indisputable. We can only hope attorneys Anne Champion, Philip Curtis, Diehl Kemper, et al. and friends of the court will do justice to the many blessings attributable to our use of these once unimaginable energy resources.

For countless millennia, our ancestors struggled to survive amid deprivation and backbreaking dusk-to-dawn labor, often on the brink of starvation – with the bulk of humanity living little better than their domesticated animals. Average nasty, brutish and short life expectancy hovered in the low thirties.

Living standards that even kings and queens could not dream of 120 years ago

But then, suddenly and miraculously, in barely two centuries, health, prosperity and longevity began to climb. First coal, then oil, then natural gas paved the way, providing the fuels for transportation, communication, refrigeration, electricity and other incredible technologies that improve, enhance, safeguard and save lives. Incomes increased eleven-fold. Mass die-offs so confidently predicted by Malthus and Ehrlich never materialized. In fact, global life spans more than doubled, and today billions of people enjoy living standards that even kings and queens could not dream of 120 years ago.

Sadly, equal numbers of people still struggle on the edge of survival. A billion and a half are still without electricity, two billion still exist on a few dollars a day, and millions still die every year from insect-borne, lung and intestinal diseases – largely because they still burn wood and dung, instead of fossil fuels.

60,000 gallons of urine every day

In 1900, New York City’s 3.4 million people relied on 100,000 horses whose “tailpipes” emitted 2.5 million pounds of manure and 60,000 gallons of urine every day. Sanitation crews cleaned it up, dumped it mostly in local rivers, and hauled dead horses to rendering plants. Farmers devoted thousands of acres just to growing horse feed. Imagine what today’s 8.6 million NYC residents would require and emit.

Today, far more powerful, far less polluting, trucks, cars, buses, trains, subways and airplanes move people, food and products far more quickly and efficiently. They take us to work, school and worship services; to the grocery, bank, drug store, doctor and restaurant; to movies, picnics and sporting events. Fire trucks help us battle devastating conflagrations, and ambulances take our injured to hospitals.

All these vehicles (internal combustion and electric) exist because of, are fueled by – and travel on roadways made with fossil fuels: asphalt from oil, metal and concrete manufactured using fossil fuels.

Even electric cars require oil, gas and coal

Even electric cars require oil, gas and coal for manufacturing and recharging. Indeed, the earth-moving machines, drilling rigs and production platforms, pipelines, foundries, factories and other technologies needed to extract, process and fabricate raw materials into the world around us exist because of fossil fuels. Every bit of metal, plastic, concrete, wood, fabric and food we see results from fossil fuels. Even wind turbines, solar panels and biofuels are impossible without the fuels that California so loves to hate.

Medical devices, computers, cell phones, radios and televisions, kitchen appliances, household and office heating and air conditioning, millions of other products of every description require fossil fuels for their components, manufacturing and daily operation. The schools and research laboratories that made our amazing technologies and other advancements possible are themselves made possible by fossil fuels.

The modern agricultural equipment and practices that feed the world share the same ancestry: tractor and harvester fuel, ammonia fertilizer from natural gas, pesticides and herbicides from petrochemicals. Carbon dioxide from burning these fuels helps crop, forage, forest and grassland plants grow faster and better, with less water and better resistance to droughts and diseases. Our bounteous grain and other crops mean fewer famines, except where forced starvation is used to subdue and eliminate enemies.

Indeed, between 1961 and 2011, the total monetary value of CO2 enhancement for 45 crops reached an estimated cumulative value of $3.2 trillion! Carbon dioxide’s annual enrichment value rose from $19 billion in 1961 to $140 billion in 2010. Between 2012 and 2050, these benefits will total $9.8 trillion!

Pharmaceutical and cosmetic products all have their roots in petrochemicals – as do paints, synthetic fibers and plastics. Hockey and football players are dressed head to toe in fossil-fuel-sourced materials.

High-rise buildings preserve millions of acres of wildlife habitats and scenic areas

High-rise office and residential buildings made possible by steel and concrete allow our cities to grow upward, instead of just outward, preserving millions of acres of wildlife habitats and scenic areas.

Then there’s electricity. Look around you, and try to imagine your life without this wondrous, pervasive energy source. Electricity was properly ranked humanity’s second most significant innovation of the past 6,000 years, after the printing press! It has created, shaped, defined and powered the modern world, and facilitated virtually every technological achievement of the past century. Electrification of nations is undeniably the world’s most significant engineering and life-enhancing achievement of the past century.

Economic growth, quality of life and longevity are directly correlated to sufficient, reliable, affordable electricity. In today’s world, nothing happens without it: communication, transportation and research; the operation of every home, office, hospital, factory and airport; refrigeration to preserve food and medicine; heating and air conditioning to save lives and enable people to survive and prosper in any climate.

Electrification will be increasingly important in the 21st century, and world electricity consumption is forecast to double within four decades, as electricity supplies an increasing share of the world’s ever-increasing energy demand. Fossil fuels will continue generating at least 75% of electricity, even in 2050.

Hydroelectric and nuclear (which radical environmentalists also despise and oppose), a bit of geothermal, and a smattering of unreliable, weather-determined wind and solar power will supply the rest. The land, resource and environmental impacts of building and operating wind and solar must also be considered.

Social media and internet search engines (to run biased searches for alarmist climate news) also depend on electricity – 91.4% of which was generated by fossil fuels, nuclear and hydro in 2016 in the USA.

Creating leisure time and wealth

Increased productivity generated by all these technologies creates the leisure time and wealth that enable everyone to enjoy evenings, weekends and holidays – and the fossil fuel transportation to go places (including to faraway, exotic locales and 5-star hotels for IPCC climate change confabs).

Finally, aside from nuclear-powered ships, our highly mechanized military gets there “the fastest with the mostest” thanks to fossil fuels, to combat terrorism and provide for our national defense.

Judge Alsup’s case is thus really about highly speculative manmade climate disasters versus indisputable fossil fuel benefits – as further documented here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and elsewhere. Indeed, today’s undeniable fossil fuel benefits outweigh any hypothesized climate, sea level and other costs by literally orders of magnitude: at least 50:1 to more than 200:1.

Barring major efficiency, battery storage and other technology improvements, renewable energy cannot possibly replace fossil fuels. Judge Alsup has no choice but to rule in favor of the oil company defendants … and all who rely on oil, gas and coal for the countless, life-enhancing benefits barely touched on here.

Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow and author of articles and books on energy, climate change, carbon dioxide and economic development. Roger Bezdek is an internationally recognized energy analyst and president of Management Information Services, Inc.



17 thoughts on “Speculative climate chaos v. indisputable fossil fuel benefits”

    • I know what an American Republican jury would say

      I know what an American Democrat jury would say

  1. I am happy to see the Oil Companies fighting the State and a Judge that is going to require proof. Mother Nature may soon win the lawsuit for the Oil Companies.

  2. Some reeally usefull twitter facts about the horse drawn SUVs to use tweaking the Warmists noses.

  3. Let those Californians go back to horse drawn vehicles, cut all electricity off and anything to do with ‘fossil fuels’ and see how they cope!!

  4. ive lived without line in electricity or water or appliances inc hot water supply, fridge n washer and i can tell you that its not pleasant and takes a lot of time n planning to get basic tasks done
    boiling a copper for bath and laundry alone is hours work, kero fridges were around but a luxury we couldnt afford
    in 1969 living in a capital city in Aus my mother n I had no power on and used kero lanterns at night, no heating and no fireplace.we couldnt afford to buy or use a kero heater. we did have town gas and a 1940s cooker in the rental, so we could boil a kettle for a hot water bottle, and cook food. we used to buy a block of ice and carry it home for a few days luxury of chilled foods. when that melted we had no dairy food, and no meat that wasnt already cooked and would last a day or so without. I was 10 and man (maybe;-) was on the moon.
    I still rejoice every day i can have a hot shower and go to the fridge or freezer..however those days may be shortlived as power costs soar.
    I now can only use my cooker on weekends for baking when powers half price, dont use the cooktop or rarely as one element used every day adds 50$ a quarter to my power bill alone.
    they tell us oldies we should be looking after ourselves eating well staying warm etc..not sure how they imagine we CAN do that on a pension?
    at least we had some rain and i now have water again;-)

    • Been there, done that (I lived in a tent for 4 months when my son was an infant… due to no money)… later lived for months at a time in a “cold water” flat and also visited friends who lived in a very cold place with only wood stove for heat (which did *not* heat up all that well in the winter) and only outdoor privy for a few years. So I can relate to what you’re saying and definatly agree. Must be part of why I like and always enjoy your comments!

  5. Ironic… back around 1990 I worked as an environmental planner in CA, and there was one project (mixed use of a golf course & limited high end horse-zoned housing) in the very wealthy community of Rancho Palos Verdes. According to CA environmental law at the time (CEQA) for which I had to come up with “mitigation measures” for the adverse effects of the estimated 50 pounds of manure produced each day for the horses in that horsey zoned community. The town had recently passed rules for their (state required) solid waste management program … to “wind row compost” all the horse manure.

    What I put in as mitigation for the project (which would later become local law) was that their horsies poo would have to be used as compost for the golf course… instead of using highly toxic and then commonly used fertilizers for the golf course.

    CA laws which often contradict themselves… may well end up biting them where the sun don’t shine!

    • excellent move on using the poop wisely n cutting toxic fake fertilisers 😉
      we could use a LOT more people like you in planning

      • Thanks for the compliment… but its been decades since I was in that business (got laid off and could not find another job without changing fields). Oh well, now they would never hire me anyway since I don’t buy the “warming” nonsense… and that is how they make money.

  6. Hey Robert

    I have your books, will there be any new ones soon? I enjoy reading your thoughts.


  7. The US educational/political system has struggled for years to collapse the economic system as demonstrated by the writings of Cloward and Pivin. Ending the use of fossil fuels is a key part of their plan. Given the 13++ years that the average child is subjected to this programming it is amazing that Conservatives exist at all. 90% of all educators are Democrats, thus there is a huge bias in our educational system.

    • Very much agree with you on the huge bias in the education system; I do not know one single “educator” who is anything but extremely liberal.

      Most of the young people I know (maybe 95%) are extreme liberals or Communists outright (tho often claiming they are just “socialists”)…. there is only one I know personally who admits she’s Conservative. The older people are split maybe 50-50… but I am also living in a rather Conservative rural place compared to other parts of the country.

      A plus though… there appear to be parts of CA that are fighting back! The parts of Southern CA that are formally rejecting the state’s “santuary state” law… so I do have some hope.

  8. Please stop calling oil and gas “fossil fuels.” They are NOT “fossil” fuels, as you very well know.

  9. These progressive, liberal, concerned, environmentally sensitive Cities should BAN the use of any “fossil fuels” within their city limits.

    This would show how progressive and superior they are.

    NO COAL-GAS fired Electrical Plants. IN fact, all electrical wires must be removed.
    NO vehicle, other than human or horse drawn, may be allowed.
    No petroleum products used to repair roads.
    No petroleum derived products OF ANY KIND within the city limits.
    Fines for ANYBODY in possession of any petroleum derived product: Clothes,shoes, medical devices,free syringes, free condoms, free drugs in plastic bottles, plastic EBT cards, etc.

    I wish my town was progressive so I can feel superior to TRUMP voters.

Comments are closed.