Colorado energy company Xcel goes crazy green

Hundreds of millions, or even billions, of dollars in additional costs for Colorado businesses and families._______________

“Colorado’s giant utility company Xcel recently announced that it plans to become 100% “emissions free” by 2050,” says Paul Driessen. “As energy analyst David Wojick suggests in this informative and provocative article, “Xcel serves eight states from Colorado to Michigan, so a lot of people should be grabbing their wallets.” He also says the Securities and Exchange Commission and Federal Trade Commission ought to look into possible fraud surrounding these claims and plans.”

“Dr. Wojick lays out the facts surrounding this scheme: from the “zero emissions” scam, to the energy and dollar costs of unproven “carbon capture and storage,” to the monumental land and raw material demands associated with wind turbines – to the human rights abuses involved in mining and processing the special metals needed to make wind turbines, batteries and other “clean, renewable, planet-saving” pseudo-substitutes for the fossil fuels that now provide over 80% of US and global energy.”
______________

Colorado energy company Xcel goes crazy green

One starts to suspect there is a lot of hype, and maybe securities fraud, going on here

David Wojick, PhD

Awhile back, I wrote an article about how the radical Colorado Energy Plan is actually designed to serve the gigantic Colorado utility company Xcel – not Colorado families and businesses – by beefing up Xcel’s asset base … and bottom line … with $2.5 billion worth of new generating capacity.

The kicker is that the Plan substitutes expensive, unreliable wind power for affordable, reliable coal-generated electricity, and thus is really part of a clever corporate strategy designed by Xcel.

Xcel’s plan was to get past 50% renewable. But now it has doubled down on that. The company just announced that it plans to become 100% “emissions free” by 2050. Xcel serves eight states from Colorado to Michigan, so a lot of people should be grabbing their wallets at this point.

Of course this is all based on the bogus “dangerous manmade climate change” scare, but Xcel stands to make huge profits from it. Being a regulated utility, the more it spends, the more it makes (and the more its customers pay) – while the utility gets to strut its supposed ecological virtues.

Ben Fowke, chairman, president and CEO, Xcel Energy puts it this way: “We’re accelerating our carbon reduction goals because we’re encouraged by advances in technology, motivated by customers who are asking for it, and committed to working with partners to make it happen.

I doubt the customers asking for it have any idea what it will cost them.

The Greens love it, of course. Fred Krupp, president of Environmental Defense Fund, says it is all about “carbon dioxide pollution,” which is a hoax. Here is Krupp’s claim:

“Ambitious efforts to slash carbon dioxide pollution are urgently needed. Xcel Energy’s vision will help speed the day when the United States eliminates all such pollution from its power sector, which is necessary to seize the environmental and economic opportunity of powering cars, trucks, homes and businesses with cost-effective, zero-emitting electricity.”

Keep in mind, this “carbon dioxide pollution” is what you exhale every time you breathe. It’s what animals exhale. It’s what plants inhale – and the more carbon dioxide (CO2) there is in the air, the faster and better crop, forest and grassland plants grow, using less water in the process.

Colorado’s radical green Governor-elect Jared Polis is politically ecstatic, saying:

When I launched my campaign back in 2017, we had a bold agenda for our state – to get to 100% renewable by 2040. Xcel Energy’s exciting announcement today, along with the strong climate goals communities like Pueblo, Summit County, Ft. Collins, Denver and others across the state have embraced, shows we are leading the way forward right here in Colorado –  by committing to a renewable and clean energy future.”

Polis and the others are deeply mistaken in thinking Xcel means 100% renewables. That is actually impossible, because wind and solar generation are highly intermittent, as I explain here. Xcel knows this too, but hides it with the following vague statements:

Achieving the long-term vision of zero-carbon electricity requires technologies that are not cost effective or commercially available today. That is why Xcel Energy is committed to ongoing work to develop advanced technologies while putting the necessary policies in place to achieve this transition.” (Emphasis added)

Zero emissions and 100% renewables are two very different things, as I explain here in my article “100% Renewable Deception.” In fact, Xcel is planning to use enormous numbers of batteries, plus fossil-fuel generation with carbon (CO2) capture and storage. That is, both chemical and carbon-based energy.

Hundreds of millions, or even billions, of dollars in additional costs for Colorado businesses and families

In particular, fossil fueled generation with carbon capture and storage (CCS) means immensely more fossil fuels must be used to create and operate all of this hi-tech and largely unproven technology. And that means hundreds of millions, or even billions, of dollars in additional costs for Colorado businesses and families. All to capture and store the trace gas (0.04% or 400 parts per million of Earth’s atmosphere) that we exhale.

Note too that the supposed battery and carbon-capture-and-storage technologies do not even exist in usable form. How then does Xcel know they will be cost effective? Clearly they cannot know this. I have seen no hint of an engineering plan or cost estimate for bringing this scheme off – and doubt one exists.

Increased reliance on intermittent, weather-dependent wind power also increases grid instability and the likelihood of blackouts, brownouts and rolling outages. Customers more and more often get power when it’s available, instead of when they need it.

Also keep in mind that “emissions free” really means no emissions from electricity sources located in Colorado. The misleading claim completely ignores the massive emissions elsewhere in the world – of very real pollution, as well as emissions of plant-fertilizing carbon dioxide – in the process of mining and processing the enormous amounts of metals, hydrocarbons and other materials required to make those turbines, manufacturing the 600-foot-tall windmills, transporting and installing them, and so on.

Enormous amounts of metals and other materials are also needed for the backup fossil fuel power plants, CCS equipment, extra-long transmission lines – or massive battery arrays, if Xcel decides it’s going to use “clean, green” batteries instead of coal- or gas-fired backup power plants. Those backup systems, by the way, actually do 70-85% of the electricity generation, because the wind turbines only work 15-30% of the time. And it all impacts millions of acres of once pristine land, in Colorado and elsewhere.

One more important point, while we’re on the topic of corporate ethics and environmental virtue: A lot of those metals and minerals – especially the rare earths, lithium, cobalt, cadmium and other specialty items required in all this high-tech equipment – come from China, Mongolia, the Democratic Republic of Congo and other faraway, out-of-sight-and-mind places. Places where child labor is common, and health, safety and environmental standards are all but non-existent.

You could think of them as the renewable energy equivalent of “Blood Diamonds,” like the ones Leonardo DiCaprio dislikes so intensely that he made a movie about them – when he wasn’t driving his heavily subsidized Tesla, which also uses extensive “blood battery” technology.

(Xcel and its lawyers and environmental and political friends didn’t mention any of that? That’s really surprising, considering how often they emphasize their ethics and planet-saving virtues.)

A lot of people who buy into the climate scare invest on the basis of “greenness.” Given that Xcel is a publicly traded, stockholder owned corporation, one wonders if this “we are the greenest in the land” hype – or any of the lofty but specific promises Xcel has been making – amount to securities fraud.

Perhaps this potential fraud is something the SEC and FTC should look into.

David Wojick is an independent analyst specializing in science and logic in public policy.

 


8 thoughts on “Colorado energy company Xcel goes crazy green”

  1. No problem, unless you’re a Colorado electricity consumer or job seeker. There are 50 states and energy costs are one factor in locating a plant. If CO wants to price itself out of the market for new businesses, as CA has, so be it.

  2. If Coloradans and Californians are stupid enough to vote for Green politicians, and support Green movements, then let them suffer the consequences!

  3. “Stupid is as stupid does”. There is no room for rational discussion with these kooks. BUT, they do make money from me and you thanks to government subsidies and requirements. These must stop. It’s time for some yellow vests here!

  4. There is a far, more reliable and 100% Green solution.

    And it costs absolutely nothing.

    Dismantle the Colorado Electrical Power Grid.

    Really, who really needs it? Mankind, sorry People, have lived for “millions” of years without any Electricity. Did not the “Green” Native Americans do so and achieved a remarkable community?

    Nobody “needs” electricity.
    You can walk, you don’t need a car.
    You can talk, you don’t need to text.
    You can sleep, you don’t need TV
    You can enjoy the beautiful countryside, you don’t need to fly

    If these people REALLY, and I mean really, believe in this? Then literally, walk the walk.

  5. Well that should prove interesting. It’s quite one thing to live in a place like Southern CA where you can literally go year round without using heat or AC (I’ve done it, for several years… only put on the heat a few times and AC maybe 3 times… but I could have easily put on a sweater instead or gone for a swim)… where all that Hollyweird nonsense comes out of remember.

    But Colorado? Like I said, should prove very interesting when they see in person the actual consequences of no fuel wjhere there is such a bitterly cold and snowy place in winter.

Comments are closed.