All – as in ALL! – climate change is due to natural cycles, says professor – Video

There is no signal at all from our CO2 emissions. Instead, “from now on the temperature will fall.”
________________

“Climate Change “Problem” Solved – its Natural; Prof Weiss”

At last someone has published a paper which explains all recent climate changes in terms of natural climate cycles instead of the fairy-tale of CO2-driven climate.

When Professor Carl-Otto Wiess, adviser to the European Institute for Climate and Energy; Former President of the National Metrology Institute of Germany, Braunschweig, used spectral analysis of all long-term climate data, he found that that all – all! – climate change is due to natural cycles. He found no signal at all from our CO2 emissions. None.

 

Some of the global warming articles are contrary to real physics, says Professor Wiess. “There’s something fishy about this whole idea of CO2 and climate. I decided to find out what is real and what is fairy tale.”

Weiss did a spectral analysis of climate data, and it showed that “all climate change is due to natural cycles … there is no discernible affect due to human activity.”

When Weiss and his colleagues looked at the existing research, which has been funded by over 15 billion dollars, they could not find even one paper that looking into the question of climate cycles.

CO2 levels do NOT correspond to those climate cycles. There is “no trace” of evidence that CO2 levels correspond to climate change, says Weisss. Instead, the relationship between solar activity and the earth’s climate is very close.

From now on the temperature will fall

You also get a prediction that “from now on the temperature will fall.”

We are looking at temperatures declining from now until about 2070 or 2080. “Not at all is temperature going up as is claimed, but in fact the temperature will go down.”

We have been having a decrease in temperature on earth for the past 15 years (this was in 2016).

It is all related to the ionization of the solar wind, ways Weiss.

For the past 2,500 years, the earth has had periodic climate change about every 230 years. This is very well know in the solar literature. It is known as the DeVries cycle.

There is also another cycle of 65 years, the AMO/PDO oceanic oscillation.

“I also have data on sea-level change, and everywhere it shows that CO2 has no control (except for food production).

Measurements show that there is “no trace warming by CO2, all change is natural.”

Warming since 1870 attributed to CO2 is in reality caused by the ∼200-year solar DeVries cycle, a well-known solar cycle.”

_______________

This talk was presented at the Schiller Institute International Conference in Paris, in June of 2015.

Thanks to Kelvin Vaughan for this video


23 thoughts on “All – as in ALL! – climate change is due to natural cycles, says professor – Video”

  1. In USA Today, it is being published that our water levels may have been much higher…
    I have been trying to show this 30 years ago with many different examples from ocean salts in higher elevations to crystal formation from ocean volcanic eruptions under emense pressure in the making of sand.
    Nothing is a true cycle as changes are constant in many areas of study in mechanical evolution.

    • There are heaps of natural cycles including the three which change Earth’s orbit around the Sun.

      • You mean to say that our planet from slowing, speeds back up?
        Same cycle at today from 4 billion years ago, not likely as many factors are missed including the imbalance (wobble).

      • It is a theory that our biosphere is totally enclosed.
        Water vapor was never in consideration that we could be losing small amounts.
        There is also evidence that our moon has been splashed by ocean water when some of the meteor strikes and skiff off our planet.

  2. In the projection graph of the impending decline in temperatures the decline in temperature is shown to be above the Little Ice Age minimum so even IF this comes true, and thus destroys climate alarm, wait for the snake oil salesmen/women to claim it is the high level of greenhouse gases which made it warmer than the Little Ice Age (which they currently dispute existed) and the catastrophe is still just around the corner !

  3. https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/kK.P8gXDRJIncXmkSaxSig–~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9NTUwO2g9NDAw/https://media.zenfs.com/en-us/us.finance.gurufocus/374dfd08d60ccde1b3d7a213a7d94be2

    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/too-pass-223209824.html

    first they draw the picture, label it, send it to the chosen few, then draw the news with moving pictures and talking heads to make the public narrative/cover as they make it so… for multi-billions “force majeure” trillions… then…. just rinse repieter…

  4. Shoud read:

    A question never discussed in the mainstream media is where did all the heat go from all that coal, oil, and natural gas burned? We burned quite alot, like a trillion barrels of oil so far. One barrel of oil burned turns into 5,700,000 BTU’s and when you add it up it’s a really big number.

    The amount of sunlight reaching the earth in just one day is so gigantic it dwarfs all energy use thus far. The actual numbers are quit incredible and never discussed because it blows the whole anthropocentric argument right out of the water.

    What you are never told is that the sun’s energy input far outweighs anything man is doing. Just 2 minutes of sunlight on earth is greater than all the energy in one year.

    If the sun hiccuped we would freeze to death. Life on earth is sustained by sunlight and if we block the sun with nuclear winter or chemtrails we are dooming ourselves. Maniacs like Bill Gates who want to blot the sun out could wipe out our specie.

    There are 525,600 minutes in one year. One MINUTE of sunlight is half of that what we consume in energy per year, so that means it would take 262,800 years of current fossil energy use to equal one year of sunlight. That daunting figure is the reason our energy use is insignificant to warming the earth. Whatever pittance of energy humans add to the heat balance equation is insignificant and not even measurable.

    If you want a good way to understand how small earth is to the sun compare it to a 24″ beach ball, the earth is the size of a .22″BB. The sun is absolutely huge compared to the earth, and it is the energy from this raging ball of fusion that controls earths temperatures, not some trace gas in the atmosphere. CO2 concentrations are not changing the overall heat equation of earth. Sun inputs energy and earth loses heat to space. What we are doing makes no difference whatsoever to temp.

    Whatever caused the earth to cool over the last 50 million years has not changed. Humans are not changing sun output, nor are they changing earth Milankovitch orbital cycles and tilt, thus the energy equation of earth temperature balance has not been changed.

    • Only one in three? Doesn’t say much about Tories. And the elected party leader is a climate change believer.

  5. Best advice. Learn to grow food in cool to cold climate conditions, learn how to raise animals for food and fibers and come up with new or old technologies to allow people to survive and thrive. Fun and games are over and they won’t be back next week because some rock star or politician says so. Civilization can survive if people get their minds right and do the right thing otherwise much of what we have accomplished is at risk. Going back to the stone age is easy getting out of the stone age is hard.

  6. The IPCC has been ordered (by the World Meteorological Organization) to add Solar Particle Forcings into the climate models they publish by 2022.

    They have been pretending that sunlight, measured in watts per square meter, is the only solar effect on Earth’s climate.

    Suspicious Observers has been reporting on this and they have some awesome videos about what the new models will look like.

    The official climate change story is about to get more realistic than “Earth has a fever, and it’s all caused by man made C02”.

    Excellent Video:
    https://youtu.be/tul07hx8V8w

    Peace from BC Canada

    • It doesn’t matter what the IPCC scientists build into their model; to the IPCC, “climate change” is by definition caused by human activity. From the glossary at http://www.ipcc.ch: “Note that the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), in its Article 1, defines climate change as: ‘a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods.’” So any model that comes out of the IPCC science group is still going to make anthropogenic CO2 emissions the primary driver of climate change.

      On top of this, regardless of what the scientific report says, the politically-based vetting and editing that goes into the IPCC’s Report for Policymakers will almost certainly strip out any suggestion that climate change is not fundamentally caused by human activity, as calling the linchpin of the CAGW premise into question would lead to people starting to believe that the government *shouldn’t* be allowed to sweep in and assume control over more and more aspects of their lives in the holy name of arresting climate change.

  7. Instead of children learning or being taught about real weather climate science they are being taught about the new progressive cultural climate and CO2 demonization by children closer to their age, like the lovable grumpy grinch, that they can more easily relate to and respect. As long as the parents and government think this is all good education for their children then it’s also got to be good for this next generation to learn early to accept that Extreme Diversity, like Extreme Weather and Extreme Social Control will continue to be our strength and tolerance of change because how else will we know if we have 5G Flu or 5G Syndrome or both? http://stateofthenation.co/?p=8201

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/school-brooklyn-hands-out-drag-queen-training-stickers-4-year-old

    Then there are the problem parents that make it hard for the teachers to teach the new cultural norms.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8wKlngHrBk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIXCtBWKmWY
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7e_SzkAOMco
    … because the new culture of transition training is like the need to train the nation to accept the new 5G tradition being implemented now too.
    http://stateofthenation.co/?p=8125
    http://stateofthenation.co/?p=5700

    http://stateofthenation.co/

    save this link above for new updated and future articles to stay abreast of the new traditions and cutural norms being brought in for “normalization”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=791tx2ex8rM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5It1zarINv0
    … because cultural diversity and 5G technology are our strength. It looks like the new trends were well planned and thought out must-be(s) and the old folks should just let the Technocratic and Social Engineering “experts” do their jobs… that’s why they’re called experts, and professionals right? Non-experts need to support, not hinder, the advancement of our new culture and the well planned out Technocratic future governed by experts.

  8. Joe, this interglacial is a very stunted affair when compared to the previous three Interglacial with possible temperature 6C higher than now. If you measure the period of time for @ +.5C for each of the four Interglacial they are about the same period of time.
    The difference with this modern Interglacial is the impact of the Younger Dryas interruptions to the temperature rise, and the re-glaciation periods which followed each event, another example is the 8500K dip in temperature. Major Geological events play a massive roll in moderating the climate of the Earth.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_volcanic_eruptions
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:San_Salvador_From_Space.jpg
    • Satellite image of San Salvador, El Salvador and the Lake Ilopango caldera (also known as the Dark Age volcano) in the Valley of the Hammocks, site of a VEI 6–8 eruption argued to be a cause for extreme weather events across the world in 535–536 AD.[31][32][33]

  9. THE Major LIE from AGW Con-Artists is the Pregnant Absence of ever mentioning any known Historical Science Data whatsoever showing how Earth’s Temps have never been as the result of the singular parameter of Human Being’s Activities… They conveniently always leave out Mama Nature’s connections with Earth’s Temps.

    Number Two: Prognosticating Climate Conditions of say 100 years from now – is a certified whopper level stretch of Guess.

    Three: Sometimes Ocean Levels Rise Most Spectacularly Following the Life-Giving Warmth after Huge ICE Glaciations.
    All Ocean Levels had to rise circa 400 feet to return us to Health.

    4 – Rises in CO2? … Follow c.800 years after Rise in Temps..

    FIVE – Today is roughly 800 years after Medieval Warming

    6 – Even If Today’s Oceans were rising @ 2.5 mm per year?
    Big Deal.. So What…

    7 – Conclusion? Warth? Is LIFE! Is GREEN! Is PREFERRED!

    _

  10. THE Major LIE from AGW Con-Artists is the Pregnant Absence of ever mentioning any known Historical Science Data whatsoever showing how Earth’s Temps have never been as the result of the singular parameter of Human Being’s Activities… They conveniently always leave out Mama Nature’s connections with Earth’s Temps.

    Two: Prognosticating Climate Conditions of say 100 years from now – is a certified Whopper level stretch of Guess.

    Three: Sometimes Ocean Levels Rise Most Spectacularly Following the Life-Giving Warmth after Huge ICE Glaciations….. All Ocean Levels had to rise circa 400 feet to return us to Today.

    4 – Rises in CO2? … Follow c.800 years after Rise in Temps..

    5 – Today? Is roughly 800 years after Medieval Warming

    6 – Even If Today’s Oceans were rising @ 2.5 mm per year?
    Big Deal.. So What… How Long…

    7 – CONCLUSION: WARMTH? … LIFE! … GREEN! … PREFERRED!

    _

  11. Why is there never any mention of Australian Robert Holmes’ December 2017 formulation of planetary temperatures’ “Mean Molar Mass version of the Ideal Gas Law”, empirically verified by Finnish researchers in July 2019, showing that any –repeat, any– planet’s Global Atmospheric Surface Temperature GAST = PM/Rp [see below]?

    Despite cries that rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levels (CO2) increase global temperatures, decades of satellite data show no such thing. Not only do circular, linearly-extrapolated “climate models” wildly exaggerate conditions, but agenda-driven political charlatans habitually denounce researchers of integrity as “climate change deniers”.

    In 2005, Danish researcher Henrik Svensmark correlated 11-year sunspot cycles with Sol’s far-reaching “solar wind”, whose streaming plasma sheath varies in intensity with solar radiation. Connecting this plasma barrier with cosmic-ray penetration of Earth’s atmosphere, Russia’s Valentina Zharkova then accurately predicted that energetic galactic particles commensurately seed Earth’s global cloud-cover, reducing temperatures by blocking total solar irradiance (TSI) with long-term “structural” overcast.

    On this basis, in December 2017 Australian researcher Robert Holmes published his peer-reviewed “Mean Molar Mass version of the Ideal Gas Law” whereby any planet’s Global Atmospheric Surface Temperature GAST = PM/Rp, ie. GAST with zero error-margin reflects Atmospheric Pressure P times Mean Molar Mass M over a world’s Gas Constant R times Atmospheric Density p. Confirmed by Finnish researchers in July 2019, since CO2 is a benign trace-gas present in only 420 ppm (.042%), absent from Holmes’ equation altogether, this so-called “greenhouse gas” can have no global warming consequences whatsoever.

    Meantime, not only have global temperatures been declining for the past 3,300 years, but Earth is presently beginning a long-term Geomagnetic Pole Reversal due to increase cosmic-ray Cloud Cover inducing a cyclical 102-kiloyear Pleistocene Ice Age similar to plate-tectonic episodes occurring since the middle Pliocene some 3.6 million YBP. Indeed, this ties with the geologically recent end of Earth’s latest interstadial remission, the 12,250-year Holocene Interglacial Epoch that began c. 14,400 YBP and ended 12,250 + 3,500 – 14,400 = AD 1350 (Roman calendar, adjusted for the 1,500-year cometary-meteoritic Younger Dryas “cold shock” of BC 9950 – 8450), coincident with Kamchatka’s strato-volcano Kambalny Eruption, a 70-year Grand Solar Minimum similar to that of 1645 – 1715, and a 500-year Little Ice Age through AD 1850/1890.

    In geophysical, plate tectonic, and solar-cycle terms, willfully pork-ignorant, “save the planet” Klimat Kultists are due for an extremely rude awakening.

  12. Just wait until temperatures fall. The climate change alarmists will claim a victory for their actions. You can’t win!

Comments are closed.