Fudging the coronavirus numbers – Includes video

Why? Because “fear is a great way to control people.”
“When government goes overboard we lose our liberties…and we may never get them back.”
– Dr Scott Jensen

Fudging the coronavirus numbers


In case you are keeping alive in your mind that the exaggerated number of Covid-19 deaths might be just an “error,” look at this:
In the US, a briefing note from the CDC’s National Vital Statistics Service read as follows:

“It is important to emphasize that . . . Covid-19 should be reported for all decedents where the disease caused or is presumed to have caused or contributed to death.”

Updated April 3 to:

“In cases where a definite diagnosis of Covid-19 cannot be made, but is suspected or likely. . . it is acceptable to report Covid-19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.” In these instances certifiers should use their best clinical judgement in determining if a covid-19 infection was likely.” [This means in the absence of a test-positive]

IN BRITAIN National Health Service guidance for filling out death certificates:

“If before death patient had symptoms typical of covid19 infection, but the test result has not been received, it would be satisfactory to give ‘covid19’ as the cause of death, and then share the test result when it becomes available. In the circumstances of their being no swab, it is satisfactory to apply clinical judgement.”

Further, according to a NEW UK law the body need not be seen by a coroner. Any medical doctor can sign the cause of death, EVEN IF THEY HAVE NEVER SEEN THE BODY LIVING OR DEAD & THERE IS NO TEST. What can “clinical judgement” mean in this circumstance?


IN MINNESOTA a State Congressman-Doctor received a seven-page document from the Department of Health giving instructions on filling out the death certificate:

Basically, it said “you do NOT have to have a confirmed laboratory test for Covid-19 in order to make the death certificate be Covid-19.”

The interviewer asks why doctors are being told to enter unproven assumptions on death certificates, and the doctor answers:

“Well, fear is a good way to control people. Sometimes people’s ability to think for themselves is paralyzed if they’re frightened enough.”

The doctor goes on to remind us that Covid-19 “is a mild disease in 90 percent of the people.”
“When government goes overboard we lose our liberties…and we may never get them back.”

Source of video interview:


27 thoughts on “Fudging the coronavirus numbers – Includes video”

  1. https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-19-umbrella-term-fake-pandemic-not-1-disease-cause/

    The human body is composed of an estimated 6 trillion cells, 60 trillion bacteria and 380 trillion viruses. Just as we have a microbiome of friendly bacteria which forms the basis of our immune system and 2nd brain in our gut, so too do we have a virome (a collection and community of viruses) which play a role in our healing. Through the ascendency of germ theory over host theory/terrain theory, the mainstream paradigm now teaches that viruses are “bad guys”, infectious agents “out there”, who can invade the body – thus reinforcing the need for Big Pharma drugs and vaccines. Viruses come from exosomes or tiny particles our bodies produce. They are not infectious agents. The exosome theory states that if cells are poisoned, they produce viruses (secretions) to clean up the toxins. This is what the plant kingdom does; when a tree has a beetle infestation, it makes a hormonal secretion to tell other trees to defend themselves.

    Thus, Operation Coronavirus is not only a fake pandemic, but also a colossal and unprecedented worldwide psy op, based on exploiting our ignorance over the true nature of viruses. What a scam!!
    Fake Tests for a Fake Pandemic

  2. I think what they are saying is that if someone has Kung-Flu and dies it should be listed as the cause of death, and other factors will be listed as proximate causes. Death certificates usually have a list of a primary cause, and several contributing factors. There really is no reason to inflate the deaths. They already inflated by the fact that you can get Kung-Flu, get over it, and never see a doctor or take a test. That inflates the death numbers, because the deaths are calculated on total deaths over total cases. If total cases are not known, and only tested, confirmed cases are used, then total deaths over total identified cases yields a high percentage of deaths. The only way to know the true mortality rate absolutely is to make everybody take an accurate antibody test when it’s all over to see how many people had the virus, and how many died from it.

    • In the US death certificates are not standardized across states (one of our states rights things). Most have an option for adding “contributing causes” but only ONE underlying cause of death. The underlying cause of death is what is routinely reported for death statistics, including mortality rates in the US. The best source of detailed information on what death/mortality rates are (very misleading “information” in the media, BTW) , how they are calculated, and what the various rates mean (that is: crude death rate, age-specific death rates, and age-adjusted death rates) along with the most current data for leading causes of death in the US and states… is the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics. The media and some politicians keep calling case-fatality ratios “mortality rates” – which they are not (tho that is also useful information). For example the most recent death data report for a year was


      The Technical notes section in that report provides detailed information.

      Currently there is also a document specifically how coronavirus-19 deaths are supposed to be documented in the US (not sure if this is the same in other countries). It seems like reasonable guidance and consistent with how death data is recorded in the US for other diseases also.


      I am a retired epidemiologist and this was my area of expertise, as I spent 15 years working in public health (as a data analyst/biostatistician and/or epidemiologist) mainly analyzing death data for a range of US government agencies. 8 years for the Boston Public Health Commission; 4 years for the County of San Diego; and 1 year for the State of North Carolina. (After that I moved on to the Federal government and still worked in public health, but mainly in injury surveillance for the military – not using death data).

      NCHI I believe does an excellent job and for anyone interested in understanding how death (i.e. mortality) data is analyzed and interpreted … I recommending reading the technical notes with the details rather than relying on news outlets – none of which I’ve ever found really understand that type of data at all. I once attended a workshop where the San Diego County Community Epidemiology (which is the infectious disease program)… met with the San Diego Union Tribune’s medical reporting person – who admitted they really did not care if something they reported was true or not – only cared about getting “headlines” … since that is the way they get promoted. Food for thought, right?

      • I’ve yet to see a DC with no place to add “other factors” or Coincidental factors, or chronic conditions prior to the listed cause of death. I also haven’t seen 50 states DCs either. We’ll never know absolutely how many people die as a result of this. I’m sure trial lawyers would want to see a higher percentage if they are litigating for the victims, and government bureaucrats will want higher percentages to help justify more resources (not opposed to having more resources). You can bet the numbers will be politicized either way.

      • Jeanie, “I got a Master’s in geography (specializing in natural hazards) from the Dept of Geology & Geography (now renamed Dept of Geosciences) from the University of Massachusetts -Amherst in 1985.”… You never cease to amaze. You and Deb must be tag teaming with all your logosense…

        YOU Do the “Math”: Greatest Propaganda Operation World Has Seen – David Knight summary

        • Thanks (I think… I don’t know Deb or anything).

          I haven’t yet looked at the video you’ve posted, but I will… maybe tomorrow. (I’m getting tired of bothering looking at news, etc. ) One of the things that is driving me batty is that the media (and including Dr. F. & Ms. B. in the US) keep referring to what is a case-fatality ratio (called by some a case-fatality rate, tho I think that is misleading)… as a “mortality rate” – it is not a mortality rate even.

          Mortality rates use the population “at risk” in the denominator, vs. case-fatality using the number of known/reported cases x 100 if you’re going to use percentage (as in 1.5% of cases of disease X are fatal). Personally, I think in the case of this disease they should be discussing either age-specific rates or better yet age-adjusted rates when comparing what is going on from one state to another.

  3. deaths at home or nursing homes in the uk from covid arent included in tallies which is weird.
    wider testing really is required to get a decent look at numbers for severely affected ratio to minor and asymptomatic
    our state govt just renewed the stayhome bans and its daft we have just 4 reasons to leave home
    and range from home isnt specified but you can be fined if someone decodes youre “too far away”
    cant even paddleboard or take a boat out alone on a lake or go fishing or play glof etc
    waaaay overboard jackboot regs with 1k or more fines dep on what state you live in.
    states with relaxed regs?
    have NO MORE cases than the nazi state ones do. less in fact.

      • “New data, for example from Iceland show that the “corona-pandemic” is rapidly being viewed by specialists and non-specialists alike as just another “flu.” In contrast to most other surveys, Iceland tested, on a random basis, approximately 3.5% of its entire population and found that only half of those who tested positive showed any symptoms.”

        Sounds like Icelanders got more “horse sense” than average…

        From Deb below…
        I used to think that this blog was frequented by people who were smarter than the average bear, but I am beginning to wonder. …still makes me think you’re really the female “evil twin” Roberta,,,not only in Iceland, eh? Sassy, pity…;).

  4. It is impossible to have truly accurate figures for any disease. All historical statistics, as are those of the present time, are simply approximations.

    According to Dr. John Campbell, deaths from covid are being underreported in the UK, because only hospital deaths are being counted, not deaths at home or in nursing homes.

    There will NEVER be a 100% accurate accounting of the death rate. But when the dead start piling up in the streets (bubonic plague) or in morgues, or there is talk of temporarily burying the dead in Central Park, then intelligent people will draw the conclusion that something out of the ordinary is going on.

    I used to think that this blog was frequented by people who were smarter than the average bear, but I am beginning to wonder.

  5. If I understand correctly, in the US each C19 death ‘confirmation’ attracts funding to that hospital? If that is correct, then it is obvious we should be suspect regarding the figures. I seen an American Dr yesterday stating that as the figures come in, the more infected without serious symptoms, the more the death rate percentage reduces, meaning this isn’t as dangerous as first presented. That’s good and bad in that much of the fear can be reduced, but the damage to everything else across the world and the advances made by the NWO folk is bad!!

  6. Robert-

    I have to wonder how our Winston Smith-“From Deb below”- knew that his comment would be posted above mine, when he clearly posted it AFTER mine.

    Something fishy in Denmark here…

Comments are closed.