Headed for MORE than a little-ice age


The latest Adapt 2030 video suggests something longer than a mini or little ice age.

The creator of Adapt 2030, David DyByne,  firmly believes this will not be a 400-year cooling event, but rather, that a 1,500- to 2,000-year cooling event is about to strike our planet.



DyByne bases his conclusion on the correlation of the sharp increases in volcanism that accompany Grand Solar Minimums.

For example, a massive eruption of El Chichon in southern Mexico around 540 A.D. dumped 8-foot-deep layers of ash around Central America. The eruption brought on the 100-year Maya Dark Age and was responsible for temperature drops across the northern hemisphere when global temperatures dropped 2C.

El Chichon was just one of a chain of eruptions between 536 AD and 545 AD that caused widespread climate change, says DuByne. It had devastating effects on crop production across Europe as agricultural production declined significantly.

The Rabaul volcano in New Guinea erupted at about the same time, and again, it was just part of a series of eruptions.

The Chen Dynasty in China was wiped out by the same event. In fact, Chinese dynasty collapses correlate remarkably well with Grand Solar Minimums.

“You can calculate and predict these Grand Solar Minimums,” says DuByne. “We are entering one now.”

“Expect more volcanism.”

Thanks to Steven Rowlandson and Mickey Russell for this video


20 thoughts on “Headed for MORE than a little-ice age”

  1. We are due for a Bond event 536 was the last one. The come around every 1470 plus or minus 500 years. Lets see how long ago was 536

    • David keys in his book Catastrophe suggests that it was an early or proto Krakatoa in the mid sixth century that caused the dark ages but ice core and sedementary records suggest that two eruptions by El Chicon in Mexico, one in 536 and one in 540 brought on the dark ages! What we do know is that around the world, especially in the northern hemisphere, records suggest several years of crop failures and empires collapsing! Also, it is recorded that a plague swept the known world in the mid to late sixth century killing millions.

      Everyone seems to be waiting for a super eruption today, but with the rise in volcanism in the last few years, how many smaller eruptions would it take to create the conditions of a super eruption?

    • According to my sources, yes. And the subsequent global cooling/climate change triggered off the Avars’ migration from Mongolia to Europe.

  2. Nice graphic, not only do Grand Solar Minimums bring cold, very wet, and very windy weather to temperate regions during the late autumn, harsh winter, and cold springs on the Western side of the continental masses, but cold and very dry weather to the corresponding eastern edges of the same continental masses during the same time period.
    Sun Spot comparison
    http://www.landscheidt.info/images/sc5_sc24_1.png
    They also bring massive, life threatening droughts to tropical regions, such as the Asian Sub Continent, East Africa, South Western area of the Sahara and Northern Nigeria.
    During Dalton many in India lost their lives to a two year famine.
    The reason: EUV powered Meridional Jet streams moving water vapour high into the Polar Regions, allowing its rain/snow fall to have a much longer path over land, than the shortest route from west to east during Solar Max Warm periods.
    SOLAR CYCLE 20/24 F10.7 FLUX COMPARISON
    http://www.landscheidt.info/images/sc20_sc24.png
    Changes to the jet stream patterns happen during each brief 4 year period between so called normal Solar cycles such as the switch over between SC22 and SC23 and the much more intense energy shut down during the complete cycle of a GSM period such as SC24 and the following SC25 as it has done for each of the named GSM during this Interglacial.
    https://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/Cycle22Cycle23Cycle24big.gif
    The Sun according to Eddy has three output cycle types: Solar Maximum Cycles, Grand Solar Minimum cycles which are followed by Gleissberg periods of reduced output. The other non-named dips in temperature in the graphic are the Gleissberg periods of several low out-put solar cycles.

  3. It sounds like something out of that thriller The Cassandra Sanction. Only, it’s a bit more positive. I personally don’t think we’re at all prepared for a major global cooling, and it doesn’t look as if any government is going to help. Of course, we all know why that is, don’t we?

  4. sun blank last 2 days- year to date tally is round 32spotless days
    last really high spotless was 2009 with 200+days no sunspots.
    last 2 days ive noted a large amount of high5 and 6 and over quakes globally. nth sth and middle areas.

  5. We are also experiencing the overall reduction in strength of the terrestrial magnetic field, with the poles wandering toward one another. This enhances our vulnerability even further.

  6. Maybe I have the data wrong, but we are in a interglacial period, right? And they only last so long, right? And 5 out of the last 6 ended about ‘now’, right? So, perhaps, with odds like that, we should consider what’s coming isn’t more of the same? Correct me if I’m wrong, but the way I understand it, this ‘global warming’ that the scientists warned us about in the 70s, was expected as the trigger for the transition, which as more recent data has shown, occurs in a few months, not a few millennia.

    • I’m thinking that just as the last major glaciation ended with the younger dryas glaciation as a last major glaciation sub cycle we may see something like it as a precursor event prior to a new major glaciation. Such an event might be what David DyByne is talking about. The initial big chill before the deep freeze. No guarantees that it will happen that way but it is something to consider or even watch for.

      • The three youger dryas galciation event were not Solar or Orbital induced but shutdowns of the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_meridional_overturning_circulation current from the Pascific and Indian ocean.
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Younger_Dryas
        The Younger Dryas is the youngest and longest of three stadials that resulted from typically abrupt climatic changes that took place over the last 16,000 calendar years.[6] Within the Blytt-Sernander classification of north European climatic phases, the prefix ‘Younger’ refers to the recognition that this original ‘Dryas’ period was preceded by a warmer stage, the Allerød oscillation, which in turn was preceded by the Older Dryas around 14,000 calendar years BP. This is not securely dated, and estimates vary by 400 years, but it is generally accepted that it lasted around 200 years. In northern Scotland the glaciers were thicker and more extensive than during the Younger Dryas.[7] The Older Dryas, in turn, is preceded by another warmer stage, the Bølling oscillation that separates it from a third and even older stadial. This stadial is often, but not always, known as the Oldest Dryas. The Oldest Dryas occurred approximately 1,770 calendar years before the Younger Dryas and lasted about 400 calendar years. According to the GISP2 ice core from Greenland, the Oldest Dryas occurred between about 15,070 and 14,670 calendar years BP.[8]

        Comment: If you look at this intergalcial in comparision to the previous 4 Interglacial, it is a stunted tempreture stub of an Interglacial, due to the Younger drys removing the heat from the Homcien Warm Period MaxThe three younger Dryas glaciation events were not Solar or Orbital induced but shutdowns of the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_meridional_overturning_circulation current from the Pacific and Indian Oceans, due to massive floods of fresh water into the Northern Atlantic. The Northern Pacific overturning circulation current may well have been affected, cooling the North Western Pacific and affecting the production El Nine and La Nena events during each of the event periods..
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Younger_Dryas
        Extract:
        The Younger Dryas is the youngest and longest of three stadials that resulted from typically abrupt climatic changes that took place over the last 16,000 calendar years.[6] Within the Blytt-Sernander classification of north European climatic phases, the prefix ‘Younger’ refers to the recognition that this original ‘Dryas’ period was preceded by a warmer stage, the Allerød oscillation, which in turn was preceded by the Older Dryas around 14,000 calendar years BP. This is not securely dated, and estimates vary by 400 years, but it is generally accepted that it lasted around 200 years. In northern Scotland the glaciers were thicker and more extensive than during the Younger Dryas.[7] The Older Dryas, in turn, is preceded by another warmer stage, the Bølling oscillation that separates it from a third and even older stadial. This stadial is often, but not always, known as the Oldest Dryas. The Oldest Dryas occurred approximately 1,770 calendar years before the Younger Dryas and lasted about 400 calendar years. According to the GISP2 ice core from Greenland, the Oldest Dryas occurred between about 15,070 and 14,670 calendar years BP.[8]
        Comment:
        If you look at this interglacial in comparison to the previous 4 Interglacial, it is a stunted temperature stub of an Interglacial, due to the three Dryas periods removing the heat from the Holocene Warm Period Max. Once the next Glaciation period starts, it will be sudden, very deep, and happen within 10 to 20 years, but not yet!

  7. Fret not, God is in Control so don’t get caught up in no hope scenario’s !

    That said and interesting enough, and about something that I’ve always wondered about…

    Why will the Beast cause fire to fall down from Heaven (The actual translation should be “The Heavens” pertaining to “above” or from the “sky”) ?

    But as the complete liar beyond imagination that it is, and to a freezing World, with fire falling from above and at just the right (Left in this sentence) intensity, the World and his people would instantly be Warmed again causing those who have its “mark” to even more confirm that “He” ( [ It ] ) is God ? ! ?

    So again, why will (Would) the Antichrist cause fire to fall from the Heavens ???

    This could one explanation ? !!!

    ?

    • Fear not! If god did not approve of ice ages as part of his creation there wouldn’t be any. Science and evolution are merely an attempt to understand creation which is everything in the universe and how it works. All matter is composted of positive , negative and neutral particles or some would say electrical charges. Forms of energy if you like. If mass accelerated by the speed of light squared equals energy then the reverse must be true. Energy decelerated by the speed of light squared must equal mass or there could be no creation.

  8. Yup, and what do we learn from cyclic behavior? I still believe the angry Sun pictures of the Mayans relating to the passing of 2012 correspond to a Sun that goes away and no longer associates itself with Humanity. when you are angry with someone do you continue to hang around or go away? Nuff said. Back to patterns, the empirical evidence and drivers for a Maunder minimum are in our face now, in my opinion the recipients of AGW welfare are disappearing now because of the cessation of free flowing AGW theory carbon stipends. The real shame of it all in my opinion has been the massive miss-allocation of resources that could have gone into mitigating the affects of the next ice age on the human condition.

    i cant be more grateful to Robert for this site. Ill be one of the Boyscout’s when it finally becomes obvious to the rest of US.

    • More likely the AGW crowd will continue to have faith in the lying devils they worship on TV and at the ballot box and stay put and feel the cold fire of the big freeze and if they are lucky gnaw their tongues due to the pain of frost bite and freezer burn….
      For them there shall be weeping and chattering of teeth and that is if they don’t freeze or starve to death first.

      • The real “movers and shakers” behind AGW, and the intent to depopulate the world through hypothermia, will not be weeping and have chattering teeth as they will already have moved to those hospitable regions that will still be left. The tropics won’t be going away, it is the temperate that will be going away. They will be doing just fine. They may not be able to sip 100 year old French brandy, but they will fine an appropriate substitute.

        I have no idea why people think that “at last, the world is going to get them,” because they will already have shifted out of harms way and left those that built their empires for them to die in the cold. That is the “privilege” of money. Always has been, and always will be. don’t have it? Good luck.

      • They will rely on the ” its climate change, not Warming” adage.
        ..i fear they will understand too little, too late..

  9. So if we get major volcanic activity many are going to say that alone is causing the earth to cool and will refuse to acknowledge the low solar activity /major volcanic link.

    I have said one of the factors which will contribute to global cooling during a prolonged solar minimum is the volcanic activity /solar link.

    In addition galactic cosmic rays increasing/more meridional jet should aid in increasing global cloud coverage/snow coverage ( again an increase in major volcanic activity due to increasing galactic cosmic rays and muons ,a by product of cosmic rays that will reach the calderas) , while lower UV light intensity should cause sea surface temperatures to lower.

    All of the above will result in global cooling as albedo will increase and sea surface temperatures will fall.

    We shall see if this comes to be ,as it looks like prolonged minimum solar conditions are here to stay for quite sometime as we move forward.

    The weakening geo magnetic field should compound given solar effects.

  10. as someone studying statistical analysis I can say this chart does not represent a correlation, never mind a strong correlation, which even a strong correlation still does not imply causation, there is way too few data points in this dataset to make any meaningful predictions what so ever, which then leads to the fact someone making such dramatic claims based on such weak correlations is completely untrustworthy or has no idea how to identify correlations and really shouldn’t be making such dramatic scaremongering claims.

    And in case anyone points out that the chart is a thousand year period, since we’re discussing minimums then there are only five in this period, this is the only data that matters and 5 samples is no where near enough to make a meaningful prediction, do you have any idea what the margin for error is on a dataset with only 5 samples, the margin for error will be so crazy you will be far more likely wrong than you will right, and even if you ended up correct it would simply be by chance and luck, no matter how much you think you know you predicted it, it still would be just a gut instinct that by random chance turned out correct. The “lowest” temps on the graph just past 1700 has no minimum or catastrophe associated with it, a direct contradiction showing that there is only a weak correlation at the least, and then there is a minimum just past 1400 that is actually very high on the graph compared to most of the samples, another contradiction that shows a weak if any correlation, in fact being a minimum at such height suggests the whole period should have been one big grand minimum/catastrophe.

    Don’t think this is coming from bias, I have said many times before, I am someone who believes we are more likely heading to an iceage or mini iceage than we’re not, but I am not so arrogant to say I am correct as a matter of FACT.

    The matter of warming or cooling is one that is very difficult to prove with any degree of scientific certainty, especially with all the global warming fraud and propaganda making it hard to find the truth, but even despite that it would still be hard to prove either way, if it were easy to prove either way some person would have provided incontrovertible evidence that would have ended this sham, people think governments could cover it up but if it were so easy to be so certain then there would be too many people sharing this undeniable evidence, the internet makes it incredibly hard for governments to cover up, the internet has enabled successful revolutions (arab spring) for this very reason, while news fail to cover stories they can still be trending on social medias, government try to block websites, like pirate websites, or purely dictatorial censorship, but they fail constantly, because anyone who has a little know how can easily in a few minutes circumvent all censorship put in place the internet, a secure internet is impossible, hence snowdon and assange types keep releasing governments secrets, showing the extremes to which they spy on our internet activity because they are afraid of the fact the internet is a free for all, no mans land, the internet has been built to withstand a nuclear attack and very likely would, no one has a controlling share of the internet, no one can shut it off or control it, all they have left then is the ability to spy on all traffic, because all traffic has t be routed through numerous computers to get to any destination there is always a point to spy, airwaves can be monitored and cables can be spliced. For example, the UK government was unable to control the last proper riot outbreak because of military grade encryption on Whatsapp means the movements of people were not able to be monitored by SIGINT, governments could not listen to the chatter for keywords to see who was attending, where or when etc and due to this the government later admitted to stock piling riot control equipment, even equipment that had not yet had been authorised lawfully for use in the UK, because with the recession, austerity, terrorism and everything else going on there is growing unrest, something our governments know too well from history, these kinds of events cause revolutions and unrest.

    A little off topic this may appear, but my point is all of this is due to the capabilities of the internet, if there was undeniable evidence it would be on the internet, it would be shared, copied, downloaded by thousands, impossible to remove or block just like all other failed attempts to stop internet piracy, because all the peer-to-peer users download data of this kind knowing its importance, without tracking everyone, getting their computers and removing it you will not rid this evidence, and they can keep uploading using the many mirror sites that pop up every day to circumnavigate governments efforts to shut down file sharing websites.

    But this information is not out there, because it does not exist, we have to be fair, while we are against a foe who is prepared to commit fraud and lie to the word using all of the media and money at their disposal, it will not help to fight them with our own lies, because this leaves a mass of the population that will just be confused and won’t trust either side of the debate, it will ruin the credibility of our debate and make us just as much of a sham.

    We should only share credible evidence, and I accept there is plenty of credible evidence, but it is about time this website and many of it users accept this evidence is only painting a small part of a much bigger picture and alone there is not enough to prove our belief, the importance of our evidence is that it should be enough to highlight the gaping flaws in the global warming evidence, but as long as we have people who are not educated in the correct feels spouting this kind of nonsense, no one will listen to our evidence, they will write it off without even looking at it and see it as nothing ore than conspiracy theory… realise this, your low quality information hurts us more than it hurts them.

    To fight the global warming scam we need to be professional, we need to be so on the ball as to leave no doubt about our objectivity, honesty and credibility.

    This graph would be laughed at by any half educated person for good reason, the claims made will be laughed at, and as I said above, once you release work like this once this leaves doubt over your credibility for ever, you write your self off, no one will listen to you anymore and you will become white noise to them, selective awareness means they will eventually not even realise you exist and thus you will have defeated yourself… shame!

Comments are closed.