Keep carbon taxes in the ground 

“De-carbonizing” the world economies can be accomplished only by limiting or eliminating democracy worldwide.”
– Paul Driessen
_________________

“Even though oil, natural gas and coal still provide over 80% of all the energy that powers the United States and world – activists, politicians and crony corporatists still want to tax that energy and the plant-fertilizing carbon dioxide it produces,” writrs Paul Driessen. “Their ultimate goals are to “keep fossil fuels in the ground,” replace them with supposedly “clean, green, renewable” energy, control people’s lives and living standards – and get wealthier in the process.

“As this article suggests, we need to bring more fossil fuels out of the ground – and bury these job-killing, economy-strangling “carbon tax” proposals deep in the ground, preferably with wooden stakes pounded through their hearts.”
__________________

Keep carbon taxes in the ground 

Permanently bury these job-killing proposals, after pounding wooded stakes through their hearts

Paul Driessen

The House of Representatives recently passed a sense of Congress resolution that a carbon tax would kill jobs, damage the revitalized U.S. economy, and disproportionately impact poor, minority and working class families. The vote also reflects the fact that America is still over 80% dependent on fossil fuels – and helps explain why a misguided Carlos Curbelo (R-FL) was able to convince only one colleague (Brian Fitzpatrick, R-PA) to cosponsor his carbon tax bill back in July. In the meantime:

Doug Ford became Ontario’s new premier by vigorously opposing the carbon taxes and pricy wind and solar electricity that Canadians have come to despise. He quickly eliminated $2 billion in taxes a year by canceling 200 heavily subsidized renewable energy projects implemented by his predecessor. Meanwhile, the Trudeau government is facing increased resistance to its plans for a steadily escalating carbon tax.

In Australia, Angus Taylor’s appointment as Energy Minister means wind and solar subsidies will soon be terminated. This will undoubtedly delight residents of South Australia, home of a 50% renewable energy program, the world’s highest electricity prices, two weeks of zero wind/zero electricity in two years (September 2016 and 2018), and some 200,000 families no longer able to afford electricity.

Eliminating democracy worldwide

Germany’s solar industry is collapsing as its subsidies plummet; its wind turbine subsidies are scheduled to end in 2020; ancient villages and forests have been bulldozed to allow coal mining to fuel its new generating plants; and the country’s Green Party has admitted that “de-carbonizing” the German and world economies can be accomplished only by limiting or eliminating democracy worldwide.

And yet, like Dracula monsters, carbon tax proposals keep rising from the dead.

Several big corporations, Republican officials Jim Baker, Hank Paulson and George Schultz, and their Climate Leadership Council now claim that 56% of American voters support taxing carbon, while only 26% oppose the idea. So says their recent survey. You ask, How is that possible?!?

To begin with, they didn’t call it a tax. They cleverly labeled their scheme a “carbon dividend” (who doesn’t like dividends?) and claimed “the vast majority of American families” would somehow come out ahead if it is implemented. The survey didn’t mention that their program would be administered by our ever-friendly Internal Revenue Service or that the tax would begin at $43 per metric ton of “carbon” emitted. (Trudeau’s hated tax begins at “a mere” US$7.68 per ton and rises to “only” US$38.47 by 2022.)

They didn’t mention that the tax would be imposed on foundries, factories, refineries, coal- and gas-fired power plants, other industrial facilities, and even (at a lower rate) on products imported from other countries. Nor did they intimate how much these advisors, companies and thousands of members of the $2-trillion-per-year Global Climate Industrial Complex would benefit financially from the arrangements.

Equally important, constant assurances that “market-based” carbon tax schemes like this $43-per-ton version would be “revenue neutral,” receipts would be returned to taxpayers in the form of tax reductions elsewhere, and revenues would be used to reduce federal budget deficits are illusory. Can the Council somehow guarantee that the next Congress will not (promptly) reverse these “net-gain” provisions?

But let’s get to the nuts and bolts of “carbon taxes” and “clean, green, renewable” energy.

Those who control carbon control life

As MIT emeritus professor of atmospheric physics Richard Lindzen points out, those who control carbon control life. And make no mistake, these are taxes on carbon-based fuels: on 83% of the energy we use. They are taxes on everything we make, ship, eat and do – on our lives, livelihoods, living standards, transportation, heating, cooling, refrigeration, healthcare, clothing and everything else we touch.

By using the word “carbon,” tax proponents deceptively suggest they want to tax soot, pollution, toxic emissions. But with modern scrubbers and other pollution controls, what comes out of U.S. power plant and factory “smoke stacks” today is almost entirely water vapor and carbon dioxide.

Fossil fuels are what made our health and economic progress over the past 150 years possible – and continue to do so. Carbon (coal, oil and natural gas) is what we burn to generate electricity, power factories and operate vehicles. Carbon dioxide is what is created and emitted by that combustion process.

So these Climate Leadership members want to tax carbon dioxide: the gas of life, the miracle molecule that we exhale and that makes life on Earth possible. In fact, the more CO2 in the atmosphere, the faster and better food crop, forest and grassland plants grow; the better they survive droughts, diseases and viruses. Rising atmospheric CO2 levels are actually “greening the Earth,” including forests worldwide.

The Council’s goal is to “keep fossil fuels in the ground,” and force a transition to wind, solar, ethanol and other “renewable” energy. In the process, the activists, politicians, lobbyists and crony corporatists expect to get incredibly wealthy and gain increasing control over global economies and living standards.

How would $43 per metric ton of carbon dioxide affect you? It would raise your electricity and gasoline costs to the exorbitant rates families and businesses already pay in California, Denmark and Germany. Every aspect of your lives would be impacted. Millions of jobs would be lost. In just one example, at California’s or Germany’s business rate (18¢ per kWh), a hospital that now pays 8¢ per kWh and $1.6 million a year would see its electricity costs rise by an unsustainable $2 million annually!

No climate benefits.

To top it off, all this incredible pain and lost liberty would bring no climate benefits. Even assuming for the sake of argument that carbon dioxide has replaced the sun and other powerful natural forces that do control Earth’s climate – poor nations are burning more carbon fuels every year, emitting more CO2 and other greenhouse gases, and building or planning to build some 1,600 new coal-fired power plants.

It is sheer nonsense to claim that 400 ppm CO2 and another 1 degree C (1.4 F) of global warming will bring “unprecedented cataclysms” and “existential threats” to people and planet. Carbon dioxide has some effect, but saying it controls the climate ignores five Pleistocene glacial and interglacial periods, the Roman and Medieval Warm Periods, the Little Ice Age, the Dust Bowl and Anasazi drought, the record 12 years of no major hurricanes making U.S. landfall, and other natural weather and climate changes.

Scientists simply do not yet know enough about Earth’s climate or what caused past climate fluctuations even to separate current human influences from natural influences – much less predict future changes.

Poor countries signed onto Paris climate treaty because they expected to get $100 billion every year in “climate adaptation and mitigation” money from (currently) wealthy countries that the treaty says must slash their fossil fuel use, carbon dioxide emissions, economic growth and living standards – while now poor nations dramatically increase theirs. With rich countries unable and refusing to pay up, the treaty is likely to implode like the house of cards it is, before or during the COP24 summit in Katowice, Poland.

Last but not least, renewable energy is not renewable, clean, green or sustainable.

Manufacturing wind turbines, solar panels, backup batteries and ultra-long transmission lines requires removing billions of tons of rock and earth to extract and process millions of tons of exotic ores, limestone, iron, manganese, copper, petroleum-based fiberglass and composites, and other materials – all using fossil fuels.

The vital exotics come from Mongolia, China and Congo, under minimal to nonexistent environmental, health and safety standards. But that’s somebody else’s backyard, so virtue preening climate activists can just ignore the emissions, habitat destruction, water pollution, health effects and premature deaths.

No wonder alarmists are ranting nonstop at their Global Climate Action Circus, devoting $1 billion a year to climate activism and “education,” and working with and for Democrat governors and state attorneys general to advance their radical agenda, draft laws and regulations, and attack and even prosecute climate chaos skeptics. This abuse of government law enforcement powers and taxpayer dollars must end.

What needs to be kept in the ground is not the fossil fuels that make modern health and living standards possible, while spurring plant growth. It is carbon tax proposals, preferably with large wooden stakes driven through their hearts. May sanity and reality yet prevail.

Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow and author books and articles on energy, climate change, economic development and human rights.

 


11 thoughts on “Keep carbon taxes in the ground ”

  1. [ Iceagenow ], You are learning !

    Publish forth the “entire” articles up front, not with links elsewhere !!

    When you are getting a message to the masses, simply publish it up front, there by getting reader’s ? !!!

    “Remember” what You are up against ? !

    The [ LEFT ], or as what band put up, The South Side of Heaven… !!

    Fight fire with fire, and challenge ideo-ocrosy ! What is happening is foretold, and preparation is being made, for-that-THING-@-the-South-Side-of-Heaven, a [ New World Order, followed quickly by a New-World-Religion ], hence, the End-of-Days…

    !

    Tell it like it is, and don’t hold back !!!

    FightOn

  2. I find asking the true believers into solar etc o they understand where the “stuff” that makes their whizzbang u beaut stuff comes from….elicits an utter blank look
    I also find showing them the clips n pics of the areas in China where Rare earths are mined n processed along with the filthy hovels aged and severely ill populations left to rot there, with no decent water or air or soil…tends to make them a wee bit upset:-)
    then theres the tiny kids in africa mining cobalt rocks, starved and abused.
    its very effective.

  3. Have we evolved so far in the last 500 years that human kind has lost all knowledge of how the things we enjoy and expect in our lives comes from??? Are those who live in the concrete jungle so ignorant and disengaged not to know where the material for their structures, transportation, clothing, energy and food comes from ?? or even just basic science knowledge?
    Are we loosing the fight against these ideologs that are using the political arena to push the modern world backwards? Are they betting on the death of millions in the future to accomplish the progressive (Iluminada) agenda.
    I don’t know about the rest of the world, but the USA is on the tipping point of loosing the fight against the George Soros brand of self determination.

  4. “De-carbonizing” the world economies can be accomplished only by limiting or eliminating democracy worldwide.”
    – Paul Driessen

    Sooner or later those who worship at the alter of democracy wind up worshipping at the tomb of Mordecai Levi aka Karl Marx.
    There is no legal escape from this no matter how much the PC democratic citizen denies it. There is no legal escape because those who brought democracy and communism to society made all competition illegal and made brainwashing of the public compulsory and inescapable for most people. People get their communism by the back door one idea at a time so that theoretically they are democrats but in reality they accept everything in the communist manifesto and call it capitalism, democracy and freedom. Voting will never free you from the mental gulag you are in.
    The global warming hypothesis is part of the mental gulag. Same thing for everything else you have been brought by the government, MSM and education system to believe in.

  5. I have a small nut and timber growing space. I have never cut volunteer trees ,chinese elm, which are considered as bad as a noxious weed in my area. But with all the reduced plant food efforts, I am tempted to cut and burn everything I am not cultivating.

  6. You have to admit that it is a brilliant strategy — the globalist/Left knows how to obtain and retain power for themselves: Keep energy prices high, which will prevent billions of the world’s poor from climbing out of poverty. Since the only thing that has ever been shown to moderate high birthrates is increased prosperity, Third World countries will continue to wallow in extreme poverty, which means ever-growing, unsupportable populations that will inevitably spill over into the U.S. and Europe in ever-greater numbers, providing the base of voters that will keep the Left in power indefinitely in those countries. Or at least until a global financial collapse. But I guess that’s too rosy a view….

    The more likely scenario is that global civilization will degenerate into an over-populated, Soylent Green type of anarchy and class stratification, with only a few of the global elite able to have any kind of quality of life, behind the gates of their walled compounds. (It’s good to be old!)

    • Halo Michael,
      There is no left and right. Democracy is just the illusion of choice. When has any party in power ever recinded the laws of the previous incumbent, never.

      And yes, regardless which puppet is in power , it is a very clever system. A Soylent Green senerio is certainly a future possibility.

  7. The evil naming of CO2 as ‘carbon’ which is ISNT. CO2 is a gas, carbon is an element, soot is carbon. This is a deception. As those on here know very well. I doubt the figures quoted about wanting a ‘carbon’ tax are real.
    Fossil fuels arent ‘fossil’ either. See here http://www.gasresources.net/
    The Russian academy of science publications have shown that is is impossible for biota decay to produce H-C higher order hydrocarbons as that found in oil at ANY temperature/pressure.

  8. Knowledge, which this website puts out, is the antidote to the “green” religion of AGW. One by one, its false theories, models and assumptions will be disproven. NASA just launched a satellite that will use lasers to measure the thickness of the ice in glaciers and icecaps. Year by year, we will get a clean record of ocean temperatures from the buoys and a clean record of atmospheric temperatures from satellites. All this data together with the new ice depth data, will give a truthful record of the world’s actual climate. Let the hucksters beware!

  9. “schemes like this $43-per-ton version would be “revenue neutral,” receipts would be returned to taxpayers in the form of tax reductions elsewhere, and revenues would be used to reduce federal budget deficits are illusory.”

    What a joke! The money would be wasted on yet another entitlement program and NOTHING would change the temperature of the planet.

Comments are closed.