Lockdown had zero effect on the upward trend of CO2 emissions

“Six months of lock down and I defy anyone to show ANY effect in NOAA’s graphs – ANY EFFECT AT ALL !!”
– Rosco Mac
__________

Lockdown had zero effect on the upward trend of CO2 emissions

Rosco Mac

We have all been told how the lockdowns made a dramatic change to CO2 emissions by closing the airlines, cruising, domestic car travel etc etc.

But does any of this show up in the “official” NOAA CO2 emissions records ?

The answer is an emphatic NO !!!

https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/mlo.html

Six months of lock down and I defy anyone to show ANY effect in NOAA’s graphs – ANY EFFECT AT ALL !!

This shows how insignificant our emissions really are – no-one disputes we emitted far less during 2020 but it had no effect at all !!

This should really terrify anyone who has the common sense to see that if COVID 19 lockdown had zero effect on the upward trend of CO2 emissions just what are we going to have to do to achieve the truly stupid claims of “Net Zero” by 2050 ?

Here is evidence that Biden (if he should win) is doomed to disappoint.

We can’t even all die because that means more emissions – seriously these people are so stupid.

 


11 thoughts on “Lockdown had zero effect on the upward trend of CO2 emissions”

  1. They have no idea the materials take energy to make. Going green takes far more energy and the output is extremely weak and in all insistences, you need back up generators to get a 24 hour energy output. But our governments don’t care and have no clue.

    Reply
  2. Human CO2 emissions are not a significant source of CO2 in the atmosphere, as this chart indicates. The climate change agenda has nothing to do with the climate and everything to do with controlling humanity and instituting globalist/oligarch system of control. They’ll get anything they want, and you’ll get global communism and state dependence.

    Reply
  3. Mauna Loa is a most unlikely and unrepresentative locality to measure the earth’s atmospheric CO2 content. In the middle of the ocean (oceans major contributor of CO2 through degassing) and at a major volcanic center (volcanoes also a major contributor of CO2). Very far from continental industrial centers, which

    Reply
  4. hey Rosco thaks for finding that n posting.
    Id seen it too
    amazingly the amount of ABC aus climastrologists claiming it DID have a big effect…repeatedly replayed with NOT ONE person asking for the detail/data/references to that…the “stated as fact” arrogance by an “expert” is never ever questioned
    and trying to get ON their caller list to naysay is impossible of course
    because damn the facts !
    this is all about saving the planet..no facts required!!
    sheesh

    Reply
  5. Mauna Loa probably has CO2 emissions that make the average CO2
    content in the atmosphere look bigger than it really is…. The mountain is a volcano after all.

    Reply
  6. If the graphs are constructed in a correct way, human emmission of CO2 can’t be the cause of the cyclical trend, like a sinus function waving around his trendline. Thats more pointing to a universal law than a man made emission. Not to speak about the past and what is meant with causation.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.