Looks like Michael ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann has sabotaged his lawsuit against Dr Ball

President Trump should love this. It will bolster his claims that climate scare stories are a ‘hoax.”

“Breaking: Fatal Courtroom Act Ruins Michael ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann,” reads the headline.

Lawsuit against Canadian Climatologist Dr. Timothy Ball concerning his statement that Michael Mann “belongs in the state pen, not Penn. State’ may turn out to be a precise and true statement of fact.

4 July 2017 – “Penn State climate scientist, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann commits contempt of court in the ‘climate science trial of the century,'” says this article  on principia-scientific.org.

“Prominent alarmist shockingly defies judge and refuses to surrender data for open court examination. Only possible outcome: Mann’s humiliation, defeat and likely criminal investigation in the U.S.”

Dr. Timothy Ball

The author of the article, John O’Sullivan, expects the 79-year-old  Ball  to “instruct his attorneys to trigger mandatory punitive court sanctions, including a ruling that Mann did act with criminal intent when using public funds to commit climate data fraud. Mann’s imminent defeat … will be both a legal and scientific vindication of U.S. President Donald Trump’s claims that climate scare stories are a ‘hoax.'”

“President Trump was elected on a mandate to weed out climate fraud so his supporters will point to this legal outcome as vindication for a full purge. It makes a mockery of statements made by Mann last February when PSI’s Hans Schreuder and John O’Sullivan publicly backed their colleague, Dr Ball and endorsed the revelations in his book. ”

See much, much more of this fine article:

Thanks to Glenn Cuthbert and Stephen Bird for this link

26 thoughts on “Looks like Michael ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann has sabotaged his lawsuit against Dr Ball”

  1. Let us hope that Canadian courts have judges that will enact a proper judgement against Mann to fullest extent of the law!
    Have waited patiently for someone to find a proper resting place for Michael’s “stick”!
    Now we need to find a resting perch for Mr. Gore, before the traitor of the people makes a grand escape in his fuel eating plant loving carbon making jet
    Wonder if they will put Mann and Gore on the same diet plan?
    Both have made enough monies from my bank account to attain huge appetites it would seem. May the courts mentally and monetarily break these 2 gents!

  2. Revenge is a dish best served cold.
    Its very cold right now in the Arctic Dr. Mann.
    Imagine that.

  3. All frauds come crashing down eventually, normally when the fraudster(s) over reaches themselve(s) with their own hubris.
    However, the bigger the fraud, the financial damage dodo is spread far and wide. Affecting Governments, Sovereign Funds and very large financial institutions, who will attempt to recover their losses from Taxpayers, stockholders and the people with even more reduced living standards.
    The Carbon Credits fund is in the same position as the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac were in the 2008 crash.
    I suspect when the Carbon Credit fund unwinds in the face of AGW being an exposed UN power play in the ongoing cold war between capitalism and socialism. That financial unwinding may well be worse than the 1929 and 2008 crashes put together.

    • nationalise all the central banks and their assets and then we have no world debt and can get on with a better world.

  4. well I for one hope he gets his butt busted, grants and any tenure etc removed and reparation required, this smug jerks been walking free too long. public moneys gone into his funding
    and hes consistently denied access to his so called “work”

  5. Oh what fine news to read. Is this the global warmists Stalingrad? All downhill from here. The next battle is Mann vs Mark Steyn in the US courts.

    • Mann never expected this to get to a court hearing, assuming that he would get some type of deal and claim victory.

      This the same thing as the climate “debates”. they will never have an honest open debate because they would be shown as frauds.

      Zero coverage by the MSM. Unless Drudge picks this up, very few will ever hear of this travesty.

  6. Soo, this really needs to be big world news. E-mailed to every news outlet possible. Multiple times, just like spam.


  7. Its like a pagan priest declaring that no one but other priests can look at his sacred texts.

  8. The US ought to take up the fight with the other co-authors of that paper, one being Ray Bradley, currently the Department Head at UMass-Amherst, where I got my MS. I know the guy, I am appalled at his attitude.

    When I got my MS (and Ray was there at the time, just not department head)… I seem to recall was REQUIRED that I put in my thesis an appendix with all my raw data in it. I figured that made sense, since a good little doo-bee wanting to use the scientific method should not fear someone trying to replicate their study results.

  9. I’m so happy that my meager dollars to Dr Ball’s defense fund have worked out for him. Thank you Dr Ball for standing up for science in the face of crooks!!

  10. Sorry to have to break it to you guys but this story is completely made up.
    There is not one word of truth to it as you will discover over the next few days.
    As usual you are being lied to by the usual vested interests – the same people who have been trying – and failing – to undermine Micheal Mann’s reputation for years.
    Don’t be suckers all your lives. When, in a week or two, you find that this is a totally fabricated heap of utter garbage then just think about it. Why would the denial industry make up this total junk?

  11. The “hockey stick” refers: Since recorded temperatures began less than 200 years ago, the preceding 800 years are based on “proxy data” e.g. or mostly tree rings, which are sub-quantitative (inaccurate). Can tree ring-temperatures be correlated to thermometer-temperatures to within a degree? If not, a claimed <1 degree C rise in temperatures is statistically meaningless. And decimals of a degree farcical.

  12. Courts will cow to the liberals and environazis and protect Mann to a great extent. Wait and see.

  13. Although I would love this to work out the way most commenters here would prefer, we should exercise caution. So far, all that has happened is that Dr Mann and his lawyer did not produce the material, the production of which was a condition to agreeing a postponement. We should wait to see how the court reacts to this before judgement.

Comments are closed.