Make lockdown permanent because “it’s good for the environment”

For those of you who are still skeptical that the Covid-19 pandemic has anything to do with the climate change agenda, I suggest you check out this video from Ice Age Farmer (link below), says reader Jean S.

Here are a few exampless:

A “Climate Lockdown,” to extend into perpetuity, reveals the true nature of #COVID1984:normalization of the police state, “climate tracing” and now “climate lockdown” as technocrats shove society towards their post-human future. Their hand is forced as the Global Warming narrative breaks down and the Modern Grand Solar Minimum goes mainstream.

In their panic, they are seizing for total control — we are at a demarcation point: we either fight now, or forever lose the opportunity. Christian breaks it down on this Ice Age Farmer broadcast.

They are getting people acclimated to this climate lockdown. That’s because “Covid-19 may be transported on particles of pollution.”

Now that you’re getting used to the idea of possible “contact tracing,” Al Gore is suggesting “climate tracing.”

“In the near future, the world may need to resort to lockdown again – this time to tackle a climate emergency.”

“Under a climate lockdown, governments would limit private vehicle use, the consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures, while fossil-fuel companies would have to stop drilling.”

This has been described as “The Green New Deal.”

See video:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ffr4VL0yklOA/

Thanks to Jean S. for this link


12 thoughts on “Make lockdown permanent because “it’s good for the environment””

  1. I never doubted that the same clique is perpetrating two of the worst hoaxes in history. The United Nations is the proto-OWG. The IPCC (“climate change”) and WHO (“pandemic”) are subdivisions of the UN. The success of their fraudulent propaganda can be ascribed to control of the Main Stream Media by the Zionists aka Illuminati or whatever they are called now.

    • They are all the same.

      The 1,000 year old battle is between the Hebrew Tribe, the Catholic Church and the Muslims….Then around 1200, the Templars showed the true source of power….Banking….by 1400 the Medici, etc. consolidated and combined with the “Church”……then from there it was only the “Masons”, the “Illuminati”, the “Round Table”, the “CFR”…etc etc, which are all the same. Around 1825 the Rothschilds consolidated Europe but erred on ignoring America. August Schoneburg was to go to Cuba, but stopped in America, changed his name to “Belmont (Those of you who speak French and German can see the trick he did). But, he was the Rothschild agent. BUT, he failed. Eventually Rockefeller and Morgan became the powers in the New World, but with the Rothschilds they created the Federal Reserve Corporation and Income Tax and took control of America.

  2. yes its all to obvious the present deaths lockdowns and restrictions would be their happy place to keep going
    the fact the poor cop it worse while they say theyre helping….the worst off by restricting the rich and closing the factories etc that actually give the poor workers a slight chance of getting ahead or at least a roof n food. because? theyre dirty/polluting.

  3. It sounds like a anti white European agenda to me and since we are the creators of high civilization and technology the whole thing smacks of genocide and barbarism or worse.
    If the powers that be succeed mankind will be reduced to a primitive state in a new dark age in more ways than one.

  4. I am not sure there is even a window left for push back. With the original “outbreak” of COVID-19 coincidental with switching on 5G in Wuhan, it is possible that the “trigger” for the killing version of this “disease” – I won’t call it a virus because I don’t know what it is – may be that system. If lock downs don’t make us yield, and energy deprivation does not make us yield, then maybe turning on Starlink will just get rid of a lot of us instead, and in comes the Gates vaccines.

    It is not impossible for me to believe that the vaccination will be the “kill or cure” for whatever they want. It is not impossible for me to believe that one vaccine will have nano capsules of poison that can be triggered to dissolve if you are not one they want. That a second vaccine can have the antidote so that those that they DO want can be saved by the same “trigger mechanism.” Paranoia? Not really. Just putting two and two together and finding out that four is a possibility.

    For the record, there won’t be many “sheep” that they will want because “the sheep” can be led in any direction. The riots proved that. But we all know at least someone that we think would sell their mother to get what they want. Those they will want, but will “vaccinate” them with a different one that operates on a different trigger – just in case they get ideas.

    • The ‘selective’ weapons of mass destruction [vaccines] are likely just one component of a eugenics or ethnic cleansing binary weapon.

  5. Well, the UN’s Agenda 21 does have, as part of its agenda, the intent to herd all humans into walled megacities, with anything outside the walls off limits to all humans. Soylent Green, anyone?

    Here is the link to a video put together for the purpose of discovering what can be done to reduce land destruction.
    It is almost two hours long, but the part about Agenda 21 is about 3/4 of the way through the film.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s4vWrHw3WY

  6. “I tell you what we do, first let’s kill all the lawyers.” (Dick, the butcher, Shakespeare’s Henry VI.) And as proof of the verity of that line I give you: “It all depends on what the meaning of is is.” (Bill Clinton, during the Monika Lewinski investigation.)

  7. Belgian Healthcare Workers Call for End to Lockdown

    Excerpts from their open letter:

    We, Belgian doctors and health professionals, wish to express our serious concern about the evolution of the situation in the recent months surrounding the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

    We call on politicians to be independently and critically informed in the decision-making process and in the compulsory implementation of corona-measures. We ask for an open debate, where all experts are represented without any form of censorship.

    The current crisis management has become totally disproportionate and causes more damage than it does any good.

    We call for an end to all measures and ask for an immediate restoration of our normal democratic governance and legal structures and of all our civil liberties.

    We believe that the policy has introduced mandatory measures that are not sufficiently scientifically based, unilaterally directed, and that there is not enough space in the media for an open debate in which different views and opinions are heard.

    The use of the non-specific PCR test, which produces many false positives, showed an exponential picture. The PCR test works with cycles of amplification of genetic material – a piece of genome is amplified each time. Any contamination (e.g. other viruses, debris from old virus genomes) can possibly result in false positives.

    The test does not measure the viral load in the sample. A real viral infection means a massive viral load. If someone tests positive, this does not mean that that person is actually clinically infected, is ill or is going to become ill. Koch’s postulate was not fulfilled (“The pure agent found in a patient with complaints can provoke the same complaints in a healthy person”). [I altered this para to smooth the translation]

    Since a positive PCR test does not automatically indicate active infection or infectivity, this does not justify the social measures taken, which are based solely on these tests.

    For thousands of years, the human body has been exposed daily to moisture and droplets containing infectious microorganisms (viruses, bacteria and fungi). A strong immune system relies on normal daily exposure to these microbial influences. Overly hygienic measures have a detrimental effect on our immunity. Only people with a weak or faulty immune system should be protected by extensive hygiene or social distancing.

    Meanwhile, there is an affordable, safe and efficient therapy available for those who do show severe symptoms of disease in the form of HCQ (hydroxychloroquine), zinc and azithromycin. Rapidly applied this therapy leads to recovery and often prevents hospitalisation. Hardly anyone has to die now. This effective therapy has been confirmed by the clinical experience of colleagues in the field with impressive results.

    In the US, a group of doctors in the field, who see patients on a daily basis, united in “America’s Frontline Doctors” and gave a press conference which has been watched millions of times.

    Dutch GP Rob Elens, who cured many patients in his practice with HCQ and zinc, called on colleagues in a petition for freedom of therapy.

    The definitive evidence comes from the epidemiological follow-up in Switzerland: mortality rates compared with and without this therapy.

    https://off-guardian.org/2020/09/29/open-letter-belgian-healthcare-workers-call-for-end-to-lockdown/ – more – including a discussion of the immune system.

    I think the Belgian group is 435 strong. The German medical group, “Save Our Rights” claims membership in the 1000s.

  8. I had a sneaky suspicion right from the start that the real purpose behind the lockdowns was not being disclosed. The virus had pretty well all gone by June so there would have been no risk in opening everything back up again.
    I didn’t guess it was the environment. I just guessed the world’s billionaires were busy creating an opportunity for themselves to make lots more money at our expense.
    Sales of masks, hand sanitizer, perspex screens, PPE, fines for breaking rules and many more obvious things alone create massive profits.
    Besides, if the lockdowns were about melting polar ice caps then surely Greta would have stayed out of school to keep us informed about new developments.

Comments are closed.