“These papers counter the madness and unsubstantiated psychosis that refuses reason and scientific method,” says reader Greg.
The papers cast doubt on the idea that anthropogenic (human caused) CO2 emissions function as the climate’s fundamental control knob. and serve to question the “consensus” positions commonly endorsed by policymakers and mainstream media sources.
In fact, these papers show that climate science is NOT settled.
More specifically, the papers actually support four main skeptical positions:
- Natural mechanisms play well more than a negligible role (as claimed by the IPCC) in the net changes in the climate system.
- The warming/sea levels/glacier and sea ice retreat/hurricane and drought intensities…experienced during the modern era are neither unprecedented or remarkable nor do they fall outside the range of natural variability.
- The computer climate models are neither reliable or consistently accurate.
- Current emissions-mitigation policies, especially related to renewables, are often ineffective and even harmful to the environment,
See entire comprehensive article.
Thanks to Greg for this link