Northern hemisphere snow cover trending upward since 1967

This is according to data from the Rutgers University Global Snow Lab

_____________

Evidence that climate change is caused by man is neither convincing nor compelling

“Historical climate change might be real, but the evidence presented to date, in an attempt to prove that any recent imagined climate change is caused by man, is neither convincing nor compelling,” says reader David Wozney. “No one has yet proven that man-made carbon dioxide emissions cause any supposed global warming or alleged climate change.”

Winter Northern Hemisphere Snow Extent – Rutgers University Global Snow Lab

“Much key claimed “data”, used to claim supposed global warming or alleged climate change, has not been, and does not become, personally verified and confirmed by people who are independent of certain governments which have a certain political and financial agenda. For example, the authenticity of most Arctic “data”, unlike some data from lower latitudes, is not verified and confirmed by people independent of governments.”

Snow cover trending upward

“However, snow cover maps or data in the coldest months, at lower latitudes, can be at least somewhat partially verified and confirmed independently of governments. Snow cover data in the coldest months shows a trend since 1967 of increasing extent of yearly maximum snow cover in the northern hemisphere. Snow cover extent, at lower latitudes, in the months of DecemberJanuary, and February can be somewhat partially verified and confirmed by large numbers of people independent of governments.”

“Science involves the need for independent verification and independent confirmation of empirical data, observations, measurements, etc.”

Snow Cover (ocii.com)

ocii.com/~dpwozney/snowcover.htm

Thanks to David Wozney for these links
.


5 thoughts on “Northern hemisphere snow cover trending upward since 1967”

  1. I’m not a climate change denier, the climate is always changing and always has. What I question is the present climate change is caused by man, because all the countless ones before this were not. Governments and media cannot be trusted to tell the truth, so we need to look elsewhere.

  2. “No one has yet proven that man-made carbon dioxide emissions cause any supposed global warming or alleged climate change.”

    Basically true.

    On a physical basis however extra CO2 in the atmosphere, or other so-called GHGs for that matter, should increase the emissivity of the atmosphere and hence radiate MORE IR to space NOT LESS !

    Even NASA show this https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/Nimbus/nimbus2.php

    This could lead to cooling – oh wait – they are TRACE gases and four hundred or so molecules of CO2 in a million molecules of air is irrelevant anyway !

    Less than 2 molecules of Methane in a million molecules of air is less than irrelevant – it is laughable !

  3. Snow covering is not a good indicator for climate change or not. On the one hand the colder it is the more water is coming down as snow. On the other hand the warmer it gets the more sea water is evaporated the more humid the climate becomes. That means a warmer climate provides more snow in colder regions.

    The green dogma of “climate change” is based on a poor, sloppy hypothesis. If you have a close look on the atmosphere and the IPCC hypothesis you can easily find plenty of sloppyness and weakpoints. You can find my analysis on my homepage.

Comments are closed.