The Slow, Certain Death of the Global Warming Theory

The Slow, Certain Death of the Global Warming Theory

 “Billions in public funding, taxpayer’s dollars, have been diverted to the “research” that corrupt scientists have used to justify the global warming fraud.”

The Slow, Certain Death of the Global Warming Theory
By Alan Caruba

10 Sep 11 – I have been predicting the death of the global warming theory since late in the last decade when it became obvious that the Earth had entered into a cooling cycle. By 2009 the leak of thousands of emails between the “scientists” whose computer models the claims were based upon revealed they were in a state of panic regarding this obvious phenomenon.

Employed by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Global Warming (IPCC), those “scientists” have since been protected by the universities who benefited greatly from the huge grants of public funding they received. The issue of whether such men should be prosecuted for deceiving the entire world remains to be decided.

The lead player, Dr. James Hansen, still on the payroll of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, is the man who told Congress in 1988 that global warming threatened mankind and the Earth. He has since switched to lying about coal and oil, two of the fossil fuels on which the economies of all nations depend, claiming they are deadly pollutants that must be abandoned in favor of “clean energy”, wind and solar.

Former Vice President Al Gore, the most public face of “global warming”, has become a public joke. Recall, however, that he received a Nobel Prize and an Oscar in additions to the millions earned from the sale of “carbon credits” to offset “greenhouse gases.” Some exchanges devoted to these credits have closed their doors. The proposed Cap-and-Trade legislation based on them lingers in Congress.

One need not be a climate scientist or meteorologist to conclude that humans have nothing to do with the climate or the weather. Watching huge hurricanes wreak havoc, along with other weather-related events should be enough for anyone to conclude that humans do not “cause” such things.

Occam’s Razor is the ancient principle that the simplest explanation is the most likely the correct one, but billions in public funding, taxpayer’s dollars, have been diverted to the “research” that corrupt scientists have used to justify the global warming fraud.

MIT Professor, Dr. Richard Lindzen, an internationally recognized authority on atmospheric science, said, “Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age.”

We owe a huge debt of gratitude to those courageous scientists that stood their ground against the global warming fraud. Recently the Heartland Institute, in concert with the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, and the Science and Environmental Policy Project, published “Climate Change Reconsidered: 2011 Interim Report.” It is 430 pages co-authored by Dr. Craig D. Idso, Dr. Robert M. Carter, and Dr. S. Fred Singer, all of whom have been among the scientists repeatedly slandered as “global warming deniers” and “skeptics” for their efforts to educate the public.

The report, in careful documented, scientific language identifies the way the warmist’s computer models over-estimated the amount of warming, ignored the fact that increased carbon dioxide benefits plant growth, that there is less melting in the Arctic, Antarctic and on mountain tops than claimed, and that there is no sign of acceleration of sea-level rise in recent decades.

A recent Rasmussen survey indicates that upwards of 60% of Americans have concluded that humans have nothing to do with “global warming” or any other aspect of the climate. This is extraordinary when one considers how the mainstream media, the curriculums in the nation’s schools, and the unceasing efforts of major environmental organizations have tried to impose the global warming claims on the public.

In a similar fashion, “The Other Climate Theory” by Anne Jolis, an editorial page writer for The Wall Street Journal Europe, describes how a project of the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) has put what may well be the final nail in the global warming coffin. The work of physicists using particle beam technology, CERN confirmed that the Sun’s cosmic rays enhanced cloud formation. The IPCC’s 2007 report had peremptorily dismissed this possibility, but then the IPCC’s reports have been the basis for the global warming fraud, asserting a “consensus” among scientists that never existed.

Thus the scientific method of describing a phenomenon, formulating a hypothesis to explain it, and performing tests to confirm or reject a hypothesis, has once again demonstrated that “global warming” is just so much hot air.

This is not stopped the Environmental Protection Agency from doing everything in its power to destroy the energy sector of the nation based in part on the global warming fraud.

Universities across America have entire departments and units devoted to keeping the global warming fraud alive. The mainstream press is heavily invested in it. Schools continue to frighten children with its claims. All this and other efforts will fail because science—real science—does not support it.

© Alan Caruba, 2011

6 thoughts on “The Slow, Certain Death of the Global Warming Theory

  1. So good to see you back Robert – I thought you were on vacation or something till I saw your post from the conference.

    And HRH Prince Charles continues to push the warmist agenda…

  2. The important thing to distinguish and to tirelessly pursue here is the certain “death” of the HUGE TAX AND REGULATION SCAM that ALWAYS follows these so-called “warmists”– I prefer ALARMIST, since they hysterically cook up alarm about something that proceeds irrelevant of human influence as the earth orbiting the sun– all for the sake of their agenda of the aforementioned SCAM.

  3. One thing Alan has dismissed with this article, and most of us who disagree with AGW, is that although “in our minds” the hoax is exposed and the theory is dying, the main stream media and the shills of the carbon tax people have NOT gone away. The vast majority of US citizens are, at the least, “under educated,” to say the least. Do not take that as saying they are stupid, because they are not. However, they have been trained to a set of beliefs that their schools have given them a sound education, and that if the news anchors tell you something, it is based in the truth.

    Although there is some ground being made with regards to “global warming,” it is far from dead or dying, and still has the ability to take away what little is left of our lives. Do not think for one second this idiot concept is slipping into the grave as it is not and won’t until governments stop talking carbon tax and the media starts reporting otherwise. People are more influenced by people being paid big money to tell them something than they are by people that aren’t making big money telling them something different. We are fringe, and until we can get mainstream to work with us, we are NOT winning.

    Look at 9/11. After all these years, we are still told 19 Muslims hijacked 4 planes that day and committed the acts of terror we saw on TV. 10 years, and we still have not seen a responsible comment made that at least 7 of those 19 were alive and well in 2002, thus dismissing the underlying beliefs of who was or was not the cause of the terrorist act. Look where that has taken us and ask yourself, have we REALLY stopped the AGW movement and its intent to downgrade the lives of every “non wealthy” human being on the planet?

  4. Tom is “Spot ON” in is assertions. Bravo! Enjoyed reading his comments.

    Not to “Hijack” this thread but, what about those hijackers who supposedly died and then came forward to prove they are (were) still alive after the event and had not been on the planes?

    I hate what happened to the people in the towers and their families. However, I have never for one minute believed the bologna the government has been feeding us about the event and who was behind it.

    So, I agree with Tom, they are intent on “down grading” the life of all who are not wealthy. Also, I believe that they are conspiring to eliminate a large portion of the population through a disinformation campaign called “Global Warming” aka “Man Made Climate Change.”

    If you don’t believe this could be true, I suggest you read “The 12th Planet” by Zecharia Sitchen. You’ll see what really happened to Noah before, during, and after the flood.

  5. All i’ve heared about this week UK had its near record Indian Summer heatwaves is how it will all go sour and we’ll have snow mid Oct. If so i’m deadly afraid. How can you really predict? But when so many people, not climateologists keep going on about it i fear no smoke without fire.

Comments are closed.