The racism of climate change alarmists

“It’s not climate change that’s racist, but those who use it to block energy development.”
– Duggan Flanakin

“In this strange politicized era when any word or action could be branded “racist,” it is especially important to take a hard look at policies and actions that truly are racist,” says Paul Driessen. “Those that deny Africans and other impoverished people access to affordable electricity and its many blessings certainly fall into that category. They are also eco-imperialist and neo-colonialist.

“My CFACT colleague Duggan Flanakin presents a compelling case for why those racist policies must be ended—NOW. He brings this to our attention just as Americans and people everywhere are starting to focus on the US election season, and what it means for energy, opportunity, jobs, living standards and equality.”


The racism of climate change alarmists

It’s not climate change that’s racist, but those who use it to block energy development

Duggan Flanakin

Climate alarmists now proclaim that climate change is racist, that it affects minorities more than others. What hypocrisy. By this theory, the Sun, our galaxy and their Creator are racist, since they have driven climate change throughout history.

Racism has certainly been a factor in many decisions about land use, zoning, education and many other aspects of our lives. But this began long before Europeans “discovered” America. Tribalism, the most fundamental form of racism historically, has been around at least since the dawn of the Iron Age.

The new racism is a prime domain of environmental alarmists, and a direct outgrowth of centuries of patronizing colonialism. Many still believe today’s poor and indigenous people must be “guided” into a “green” tomorrow and not allowed use the tools that Western and other countries employed to grow, create wealth, improve living standards and remain free.

Many even seem okay that their “solutions” to “climate change” yield highly negative results for billions of people worldwide, whose lifestyles are far removed from the privileges of eco-elites – who don’t even enjoy the blessings of electricity, 24/7/365 or even at all.

Instead of recognizing their own role in sustaining energy poverty (and its resultant misery, disease and death), the alarmists berate the West for escaping generational poverty through technology. Penn State meteorologist Gregory Jenkins (who works for Dr. Michael Mann, co-creator of dangerous Mann-made climate change) has linked racism to climate change “because it dictates who benefits from activities that produce planet-warming gases and who suffers most from the consequences.”

But their “solutions” always deny African and other poor families access to fossil fuel “activities” – and blessings – while burdening their own societies with heavy taxes and mandates that would curtail affordable energy and living standards for billions.

Fifteen years ago, Cameroonian journalist Jean-Claude Shanda Tomme said environmentalists “still believe us to be like children that they must save, as if we don’t realize ourselves what the source of our problems is.” Incredibly, this remains a prevailing attitude.

Nearly two decades ago, in his seminal book Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death, Paul Driessen exposed the eco-colonialism (and racism) of European and American nongovernmental organizations, banking institutions and governments.

In its introduction, Congress Of Racial Equality national spokesman Niger Innis said the green elites’ policies “prevent needy nations from using the very technologies that developed countries employed to become rich, comfortable and free of disease. And they send millions of infants, children, men and women to early graves every year.”

They insist that Africans not be allowed to combat malaria with DDT, which eradicated malaria throughout the developed world. Nor may Africans rely on their abundant oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear or hydroelectric resources, the same technologies and resources that built Western and Eastern societies.

Multiple voices have demanded that the West stop smothering Africans with money that fuels massive corruption. A decade ago, in reviewing Dambisa Moyo’s brilliant 2009 book, Dead Aid, I recalled her litany of “sins of aid with strings.” It fuels corruption, encourages inflation, increases debt loads, kills exports, causes civil unrest, frustrates entrepreneurship, and disenfranchises citizens.  In effect, foreign aid is also racist. Kenyan economist James Shikwati agrees.

My colleagues and I pointed out that $500 billion in foreign aid had done little to improve the lives of ordinary Africans, who still had few highways, no real electric grid, little sanitation or clean water, few hospitals, and millions dying annually from diseases almost entirely wiped out elsewhere in the world.

At that time, OPEC Secretary General Mohammed Barkindo pleaded with Western leaders that “energy is fundamental for economic development and social progress. While the use of all forms of energy is welcome, it is clear that fossil fuels will continue to satisfy the lion’s share of the world’s growing energy needs for decades to come.” But Africans are still routinely denied financing to develop those resources for their own citizens. This is racism at its worst.

I also reviewed a World Bank Development Research Group proposal for building a 100,000-kilometer African highway system to connect all major African capitals and large cities. It would cost just $30 billion, plus $2 billion a year in maintenance, but could generate $750 billion a year in overland trade among African nations. But it quickly hit the environmentalist/development bank dustbin. Pure racism.

The racism even extended to higher education, as European and American universities recruited Africa’s brightest and best African students and faculty, leaving their own fledgling institutions of higher learning in shambles. Lydia Polgreen said this academic flight “depriv[ed] dozens of nations of the homegrown expertise that could lift millions out of poverty.” More racism.

And so it continues. African Energy Chamber Executive Chairman N.J. Ayuk recently criticized the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and International Energy Agency (IEA) for describing low oil prices caused by the COVID 19 pandemic as “golden opportunity” for governments to phase out fossil fuels support – and thus better living standards.

He put it bluntly: “The OECD and IEA don’t necessarily know what’s best for the people who live on this planet. Pressuring governments to stop supporting fossil fuels certainly would not be good for the African oil and gas companies or entrepreneurs striving to build a better future. And it could be downright harmful to communities looking at gas-to-power initiatives to bring them reliable electricity.”

“Too often,” Ayuk added, “the discussion about climate change – and the call to leave fossil fuels in the ground – is largely a Western narrative. It does not factor in the needs of low-income Africans who could reap the many benefits of a strategic approach to oil and gas operations in Africa: Reduced energy poverty, job creation, and entrepreneurship opportunities, to name a few.”

On the global stage, he concluded, the OECD and the IEA are “dismissing the voices of many Africans who want and need the continent’s oil and gas industry to thrive.” African energy entrepreneurs and Africans who care about energy poverty are basically saying, “I can’t breathe.” But their voices are ignored by these power brokers, and the world.

Journalist Geoff Hill highlighted how many Africans still rely on increasingly scarce firewood to cook and heat their homes on cold nights, despite the environmental damage caused by stripping forest habitats to oblivion. Of the world’s 50 countries with the least access to electricity, 41 are in Africa – despite abundant rivers, sunlight, and oil, gas, coal and uranium reserves.

The chief reason, Hill explained, is corruption – traced back to the foreign aid Dambisa Moyo criticized. Climate alarmists naturally say it’s someone else’s fault. Thankfully, finally, says Hill, some Africans are admitting their own role in allowing corrupt cultures to rule them.

Nigerian neurosurgeon Dr. Sylvanus Ayeni’s 2017 book Rescue Thyself details the failure of African governments to serve their people. He is saddened that, despite over a trillion dollars in aid to Africa from the U.S. alone, so much has been blown on palaces, private jets and outright theft.

But who empowered these greedy leaders, who sought to do what donors wanted? Will the West finally recognize that it was their paternalistic racism that empowered this corruption? Will it change its ways? Or will it just continue the eugenic practices that dehumanized Africans as “unfit” to reproduce?

Duggan Flanakin is Director of Policy Research at the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (

8 thoughts on “The racism of climate change alarmists”

  1. Many movie posters for the film featured a long blurb that read: “You see them on the street. You watch them on TV. You might even vote for one this fall. You think they’re people just like you. You’re wrong. Dead wrong.”.
    Rereleased “They Live” movie poster for 2020

    One line from the movie:
    “Life’s a bitch and she’s back in heat”
    Seems to apply to all the above and all of 2020 so far.

  2. I agree. Also to help c02 reduction and brain drain of developing countries we should BAN immigration i to the united states and follow thru w mass deportations. We will aso be saving people from having ti deal with the most “racist” country as well. Its a win win!

  3. The problem is, far too many people have drunk the ‘kool aid’, have allowed themselves to be controlled, manipulated, and have lost their ability to reason or think! So much going on right now in the world of climate and anyone with an inkling of curiosity can find lots of data to support the onslaught of the GSM. All of the extreme weather events, increasing seismic and volcanic activity, the resulting destruction of tens of million of acres of crops around the world, are all well documented from history as being effects of this major climatic event! But, few realize what’s happening … they’re mired in their IPCC warming narratives!

    • JNS, Actually, if there is one bit of propaganda to which most Americans remained immune (or perhaps only apathetic) it was the global warming hoax. To be sure, there were some young, ignorant idealists who were taken in by the propaganda– but nothing like in Europe or Scandinavia.

      And of course the heads of those Green environmental groups were directly paid and their programs directly subsidized by the billionaires– same ones that are behind convid.

      quotes from a Senate report on the global warming hoax:

      “the Billionaire’s Club gains access to a close knit network
      of likeminded funders, environmental activists, and government bureaucrats who specialize in manufacturing phony “grassroots” movements and in promoting bogus propaganda disguised as
      science and news to spread an anti-fossil energy message to the unknowing public. ”

      Here are a few donor-managers
      “Billionaire’s Club Private Foundations
      Foundation Total Assets – 2012
      David and Lucile Packard Foundation $6,299,952,716
      Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation $5,697,258,026
      Heinz Family Foundation $117,095,904
      Marisla Foundation $51,482,397
      Park Foundation $366,405,008
      Rockefeller Brothers Foundation $800,956,943
      Schmidt Family Foundation $46,542,559
      Sea Change Foundation $124,350,435*
      Walton Family Foundation $1,999,066,369
      William and Flora Hewlett Foundation $7,735,371,139
      * Assets from most recent IRS Form-990-PF available (2011)

      ” they employ a “prescriptive grantmaking” technique wherein they seek beneficiaries whose actions and work fit the agenda of the foundation and its donors.”

      for example, “a $200,000 grant from the
      William and Flora Hewlett Foundation to the Union of Concerned Scientists “for coal retirement and removing market barriers to renewable energy projects;”

  4. Benito Mussolini, an ex-socialist who implemented one such scheme almost a century ago, said it memorably:.
    “For if the nineteenth century was a century of individualism (Liberalism always signifying individualism) it may be expected that this will be a century of collectivism, and hence the century of the State.
    ‘The planet Earth is cooling. The interglacial climate period that has kept us warm for the last several thousand years, allowing civilization to rise and flourish, is over. Earth is about to return to the deep-freeze conditions of the last ice age that ended some 12,000 years ago, when all of Canada and much of Europe were covered by the sort of thick continental glaciers that today blanket remote Greenland and Antarctica.’ – This scientific “truth” was drilled into me, a young geology undergrad in Calgary, by esteemed professors in basic courses at the beginning of the 1980s.

    In 1633, the great Galileo famously saved himself from the Inquisition by formally recanting his scientific views. He got away with merely house arrest…. ‘real scientists’ today rejected the man-made global warming hoax… ergo… Conjob-1984 and house arrest in 2020.

    The Great Reset Fraud
    As I laid out in my recent paper The Great Reset Fraud, this program is little more than a cover for global depopulation and world government run by the same arsonists who have lit the world economy on fire in the first place.
    Carney and Trans-Freeland
    She then smiled and stated that this crisis is actually a wonderful opportunity.

Comments are closed.