Vaccine recipients being misled to a criminal extent?

Former vice-president of Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeardon, raises serious concerns.

Dr Yeadon’s letter to the UK Health Minister reads:

“Dear Mr. Hancock,

I have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research based PhD in pharmacology. I have spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R&D, mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin. I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco – acquired by Novartis). I’m knowledgeable about new medicine R&D.

I have read the consultation document. I’ve rarely been as shocked & upset.

All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been in development for more than a few months.

If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent.

This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information. My concern does not arise because I have negative views about vaccines (I don’t), Instead, it’s the very principle that politicians seem ready to waive that new medical interventions at this, incomplete state of development- should not be made available to subjects on anything other than an explicitly experimental basis. That’s my concern.

And the reason for that concern is that it is not known what the safety profile will be, six months or a year or longer after dosing.

You have literally no data on this & neither does anyone else.

It isn’t that I’m saying that unacceptable adverse effects will emerge after longer intervals after dosing.

No: it is that you have no idea what will happen yet, despite this, you’ll be creating the impression that you do.

Several of the vaccine candidates utilise novel technology which have not previously been used to create vaccines. There is therefore no long term safety data which can be pointed to in support of the notion that it’s reasonable to expedite development & to waive absent safety information on this occasion.

I am suspicious of the motives of those proposing expedited use in the wider human population. We now understand who is at particularly elevated risk of morbidity & mortality from acquiring this virus.

Volunteers from these groups only should be provided detailed information about risk / benefit, including the sole point I make here. Only if informed consent is given should any EXPERIMENTAL vaccine be used.

I don’t trust you. You’ve not been straightforward & have behaved appallingly throughout this crisis.

You’re still doing it now, misleading about infection risk from young children. Why should I believe you in relation to experimental vaccines?

Dr. Michael Yeardon

Thanks to Richard for bringing this letter to our attention

5 thoughts on “Vaccine recipients being misled to a criminal extent?”

  1. Many of the COVID-19 vaccines currently being fast-tracked are not conventional vaccines. Their design is aimed at manipulating your very biology, and therefore have the potential to alter the biology of the entire human race.

    The theory behind these vaccines is that when you inject the mRNA into your cells, it will stimulate your cells to manufacture their own viral protein. The mRNA COVID-19 vaccine will be the first of its kind. No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed before.

    The process is called transfection; unlike conventional inoculation the vaccine penetrates cell walls. Moderna co-founder Derrick Rossi, a Harvard researcher reprogrammed stem cells using modified RNA, thus changing the function of the stem cells. Moderna was founded on this concept of being able to modify human biological function through genetic engineering, says Dr. Carrie Madej.

    The administering bandage has rows of tiny microneedles and a hydrogel base that contains luciferase enzyme and the vaccine itself, delivering the modified synthetic RNA into the nucleus of your cells. RNA is essentially coding material that your body uses. In this case, the instructions are to produce the SARS-CoV-2 viral protein.

    Transfection is the process used to create genetically modified organisms.

    Best you should read the whole article yourself.

  2. I couldn’t help but notice, Dr. Michael Yeardon, that you failed to mention survival rate of this “Terrible disease”! Is it not true that 99.5% of those that contract this virus live?

    It seems that even if there are “Side effects including death”, that a drug or vaccine that you, Dr. Yeardon, had a hand in developing could be approved providing the percentage of death is small.
    I think Dr Yeadon should listen to the many commercials on our TV. For instance, a drug that prevents depression that has, among the many other side effects includes depression and possible suicide. Say what????
    How about the “XYZ” drug that may fix one problem, but reduces your immune system to the point at which your immune system may attack normal cells? However. they are “Selling it”, so it must have been “Approved”!

    At work, my friend was organizing the drugs for his bedridden mother staying at his home. The first pill was to fix the main problem while the second pill was to relieve the side effects of the first pill. Of course, the third pill was to fix the side effects of the second pill — And so on up to 27 pills in all….
    Well Doc, tell me none of those pills were made by Pfizer with “Your” finger stirring the pot!

    So, is there any drug out there that is “Perfect” with no side effects? I don’t think so! However, they did state the vaccine was 90% effective, and that’s better than nothing!

  3. Big Pharma arguing against the COVID vaccine? Why? Because they know they have never been required to perform the level of clinical study or testing for drugs labelled vaccines, as other prescribed medications. And if there are deaths or injury, it will place a magnifying glass not just on COVID vaccines but all vaccines! That is why there is a law preventing anyone from suing the drug manufacturers for vaccine related death or illness, despite the fact that there are 10’s of thousands of alleged vaccine related illnesses and death contained in the CDC’s own database, and 100’s of studies suggesting harmful side effects of vaccines …

  4. Do you see what i see ?
    Page 11
    6.5.1 Safety Endpoints
    • Immediate reactions
    • Solicited local and systemic reactions occurring through Day 7 post-vaccination
    • Unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 7 post-vaccination
    • Serious adverse events that occurred through Day 180 post-vaccination
    • Adverse events that resulted in a hospital admission, life-threatening episode, medical condition that
    required three or more office or emergency room visits, and diagnosis of low blood count or low platelet
    count, swelling or redness of the joints, asthma, diabetes, or autism through Day 180 days post vaccination

Comments are closed.