Where is the loudly promised ‘global warming’?

“The CO2 meme of human caused warming has been a lie. None of predictions so far have happened.”
– tomOmason

Where is the loudly promised ‘global warming’?

By tomOmason

Coming out of the Little Ice Age should be marked by the non-event of a normal and natural reduction in ice globally, this means mountain glaciers recede, polar icecaps reduce. Exiting the LIA should ensure this planet quite naturally becomes both warmer and wetter, helping the biosphere to flourish.

As both are currently not making much headway, are we gently slipping back into another cold era? During the start of the LIA it was not unusual to have hot and dry periods, just as much as wet and very cold periods. The weather became less predictable as the jetstreams often turned more ‘loopy’, and snow and ice built-up on glaciers and the poles, while temperate and tropical areas of the world turned drier. Food becomes the big issue as the seasons become more unpredictable, more extreme — extended droughts and wet deluges, extended cold winters and baking hot short summers.

Did we really entirely exit the LIA? Maybe the last 150 years or so just been a mildly warm holding pattern before the planet cools again.

Where is the loudly promised ‘global warming’? I want 2-4°C warming just like in the ‘all natural’ Medieval Warm Period, when nature and people flourished. However it looks very unlikely to happen soon.

Apart from the slightly warmer ‘blip’ from the late 1990s to about 2008 there’s been only a little warming — arguably it was as warm, if not warmer in the 1930s, either way the warming that has happened has not been that unusual in rate of change or amount. There’s not been much evidence of climate change that is consistent with warming (sea-levels are stable, polar ice and snow are not rapidly receding, etc.) despite all the publicity and MSM hyperbole.

In the last 100 to 150 years the average global temperature rise amounts to about 1°C — now that looks to me very natural, hardly extreme warming!

The CO2 meme of human caused warming has been a lie. None of predictions so far have happened. While this world shows signs of cooling, not evidence of continued warming, certainly this is so while the sun enters a solar minimum; a minimum that we have little concrete knowledge about — how cold the weather is likely to go, or how long it will last.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Now work out why (hint: UN/World Bank globalist ambitions).

Ask yourself why so many rich and powerful people are backing this CAGW meme, and why so many of the same people fret about human over-population. Reflect on the fact that most of these same people have very resource-hungry lives that ensure they use large vehicles, jet around the world, and so often they buy high maintenance beach-front properties Reflect on the fact that Main Stream Media companies are controlled by these people.

Eugenic by Stealth

Wouldn’t negligently allowing a global cooling to happen serve a dual purpose of entrenching these rich and powerful types into positions of even more power, more wealth, while reducing the human population? Malthusian misanthropes and the Fabians would love it, an act of ‘Eugenic by Stealth’.

Isn’t that what the ‘One World Order’ and the UN’s Agenda 2030 (aka Agenda 21) about? — see https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22267-un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism for more.

When will the UN’s conferences be Eco-friendly, ‘sustainable’, and green as laid down by their own Agenda 2030 standards?

When will UN officials be ‘encouraged’ to teleconference, use only battery powered vehicles both privately and publicly?

When will the UN buildings everywhere be very efficiently powered by just hydroelectric, wind, and solar?

25 thoughts on “Where is the loudly promised ‘global warming’?

  1. Amen to the U.N. using ONLY so called Green Energy. When their freezing their little butts off or sweltering in non a.c. buildings they will shut up about AGW.

  2. You cannot reach people after they have been indoctrinated by the UN and the AGW crowd. And by our education system.

    I don’t know if the schools even mention the Ice Age anymore – except to teach that it was Donald Trump’s fault that the ice sheets receded 12,000 years ago.

  3. CO2 is very sneaky. It will unleash catastrophe sometime very soon, or maybe in a century, or maybe in a millennium. In the meantime, it will continue to cause acne in teens. We must fight CO2 by reversing prosperity. Only when we live in mud huts shivering in the cold and eating bugs will the battle be won. And we will praise our globalist masters living in luxury and comfort for saving Earth.

  4. No, they won’t.

    The peasants (you and me) will suffer, but the Fat Ass Al Gore will A/C his 10,000 sq. ft. home…………………

  5. If one accepts the CO2 concentrations of the atmosphere are “ball park” OK and the measured temperatures are “ball park” OK then the increase from 280 to 400 ppm is an increase of 0.43 – 120/280 = ~0.43.

    The more recent IPCC reports state the range of temperature increases for doubling CO2 is 1.5°C to 4.5°C .

    So as the increase to date is about 0.43 doubling CO2 levels of 280 ppm and using the range 1.5°C to 4.5°C the temperature according to IPCC science should be 0.64°C to 1.93°C – 0.43 x 1.5 to 0.43 x 4.5.

    The observed increase of ~1°C fits neatly within this range, only slightly on the lower side so what is the problem with the IPCC claims ?

  6. meanwhile in Aus the BoM is now saying that the COOLER oceans to the nth and west especially..means a warmer srping less rain etc
    hmm so the hotwaters baking corals ,line had to be sorta forgotten a bit in light of FACT?
    last time i looked the east coast waters werent real warm either

  7. Well, “they” had had error, not 10 decrees, but 4 degrees. increase (F).

    But these suckers were wrong, even if their moronic statements were right, they were wrong.

    Check out Lord Monckton and his work trying to understand the bad science of the IPCC. The IPCC could not understand that the sun is shining down on earth. Believe or not.

    • Lord Monckton COMPLETELY ACCEPTS that the IPCC definition of the “greenhouse effect” is correct and therefore he is not a sceptic at all.

      One TRUE BELIEVER amongst so many other true so called sceptic believers of the greenhouse effect whose only claim is that it won’t be too bad and that makes the IPCC scientists suckers and wrong ?

      Pull the other one.

  8. they have been tackling climate change with geoengineering! ofcourse we wont see the effects of global warming, they are ploughing the skys with aluminium oxide.

  9. tomOmason has pointed at the reason for climate hysteria. It IS all about depopulating the world BEFORE the ice age sets in. This allows those in power to take over where they want to be as the cold sets in. The switch to “green” energy almost guarantees an inadequate supply, to say nothing about an erratic supply, thus insuring hypothermic deaths to pile up among the poor, infirm, and elderly (aka “useless eaters”). During the LIA children were sacrificed to save other children, thus the gene pool shrinks as well as the population. It is but one way the population is being attacked, there are others.

    And yes, the indoctrination that the “education system” in ALL countries regarding the issue suggests that the struggle will only get worse if the big freeze doesn’t start sooner rather than later.

    • Incidentally, that is the reason that data does not affect the argument. The “crisis” is planned, and its use is to reduce population, so you can’t change their minds as it would negate their master plan.

    • Would not a simple WAR not solve the problem?

      War is faster and cleaner. It also makes a lot of money for those in control.

      I, personally, would prefer WAR over starvation and freezing.

  10. Good article by tomOmason! to John B.: people like that are only “reached” by reality, which is on it’s way! Rosco on CO2: CO2 is BENEFICIAL! See James Hogan’s book Killing the Sacred Cow. Maybe if I mention it often enough some of you will read it! Anyone who has, please email me at owlandturtlejapan@yahoo.com. Thanks. Heidi

    • They can’t be reached by reality because they are agenda driven and data and reality have no place in their agenda. They are winning because they have the MSM to reach the billions and we have sites like this to reach each other since we didn’t buy into the Kool-Aid. It may make us feel good to know we are right and it will be proven, but it doesn’t change anything.

      Make no mistake, this isn’t about science, it is about controlling the future so stop dreaming that “reality” will win them over. It won’t, and the “reality” they have set in motion with their direct attack on cheap energy production will destroy millions if not billions of lives when cold weather comes home to roost. And all the hot air we pump while patting ourselves on the back knowing WE are right won’t be enough to keep the poor from freezing to death.

      Our true only hope is political activism and office seeking, but that will be an enormously uphill fight for those that try it since they will be pounded daily by the MSM.

  11. According to ice core records, the last millennium 1000AD – 2000AD has been the coldest millennium of our current Holocene interglacial. This point is more fully illustrated with ice core records on a millennial basis back to the Eemian period here:

    Our current, warm, congenial Holocene interglacial, although cooler than the Eemian interglacial 120,000 years ago, has been the enabler of mankind’s civilisation for the last 10,000 years, spanning from mankind’s earliest farming to the most recent technologies.
    Viewing the current Holocene interglacial on a millennial basis is rational. Sadly it seems that, driven by the need to continually support the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming hypothesis / religion Climate Alarmists irrationally examine the temperature record at much too fine a scale, weather event by weather event, month by month, or year by year.
    From the broader perspective, each of the notable high points in the current 11,000 year Holocene temperature record, (Holocene Climate Optimum – Minoan – Roman – Medieval – Modern), have been progressively colder than every previous high point.
    Greenland ice core records show that for its first 7-8000 years, the early Holocene, had virtually flat temperatures, including its early high point known as the “climate optimum”. But the more recent Holocene, since a “tipping point” at around 1000BC, 3000 years ago, has seen temperature fall at about 20 times faster than its earlier rate.
    The Holocene interglacial is already 10 – 11,000 years old and just judging from the length of previous interglacial periods, the Holocene epoch should be drawing to its close: in this century, the next century or this millennium.
    Nonetheless, Climate alarmists promoting their views have converted the slight and truly beneficial warming at the end of the 20th century to a Modern high point “Great Man-made Global Warming Catastrophe”.
    The recent warming since the end of the Little Ice Age has been wholly beneficial when compared to the devastating impacts arising from the minor cooling of the Little Ice Age.
    As global temperatures, after their short spurt at the end of the last century, are showing stagnation or cooling for the last twenty years, the world should now fear the real and detrimental effects of cooling, rather than being hysterical about limited, beneficial or probably now non-existent further warming.
    Warmer times are times of success and prosperity for man-kind and for the biosphere.
    But the coming end of the present Holocene interglacial will eventually again result in a mile high ice sheet over much of the Northern hemisphere.
    That reversion to Ice Age conditions will be the real climate catastrophe.
    With the present reducing Solar activity, significantly reduced temperatures, at least to the level of another Little Ice Age are predicted quite soon this century.
    Whether the present impending cooling will really lead on to a new glacial ice age or not is still in question.

  12. Tired of Hot weather . Seriously need cold and frigid weather for at least 6 months and snowstorms as well!! Hope miracle happen..

  13. Nowhere to be seen. And yet every few months we routinely see a headline claiming that this or that measurement show that global warming is worse than any previous prediction, and “unprecedented”.

    I think that they think that we are idiotic gold fishes that forgot ludicrous predictions from the 00s like “children a decade from now will not know what snow is”, and a snow-free Everest in 30 years.

    Sadly, though, their scare tactics do work with the young, who haven’t yet heard the boy crying wolf so many times as we have.

  14. Three years ago, when my daughter was in Grade 7 in public school Vancouver Canada, her teacher asked students to write a paper on climate change.

    My daughter did ask for my input. We reviewed a number of topics. In the end she decided she wanted to do her paper on the research by Professor Valentina Zharkova at the University of Northumbria which analyzed electrical waves on the surface and interior of the Sun to forecast a new Ice Age by 2020.

    Her Grade was A+.

    The teacher, also the school’s Vice Principal, told me in the parent teacher interview that she supported the current BC government (a coalition of the Green Party and New Democratic Party).

  15. A smaller population would produce less.
    If there were a nefarious plan by industrialists to permanently ensconce themselves in the seats of power they would want more people.
    Not fewer.

    • Far fewer is what they are going to get, and regional world government control far worse than what the Nazis and Communists achieved in the last century, and the Islamist’s wont to achieve in this one.

  16. Rosco’s first mistake is trying to use linear math to approximate an inherently logarithmic function where the response to CO2, or any GHG is decreasing. We are already at the 1C or less part of the falling curve.

    He may claim that feedbacks change this.

    He secondly claims Monckton accepts the Greenhouse effect. Well, that is a rather sweeping statement covering the idea that the feedbacks are high and will cause the problems while over the last ten years the sensitivity of the atmosphere that is accepted, even by the IPCC types, has been dropping.

    In other words the luke warmers like Monckton have not accepted the higher sensitivites that would cause the IPCC warming projections.

    Finally I will let Monckton explain in this recent article why the feedbacks have been computed incorrectly making even the luke warmers exagerate their projections and making a laughing stock out of the alarmists scam.


    I would add that Dr. Spencer claims this formula is not used in the models. I suggest he is not being completely accurate. The models are tuned based on what they BELIEVE will happen from the incorrect feedback calculations. Either that or they just made the stuff up and KNOW their feedback calcs were wrong.

Comments are closed.