Who is guarding the (dictatorial) guards?


“Hillary Clinton is incredibly lucky. Just imagine FBI Director James Comey’s dilemma if he couldn’t use the “no intent to violate the law” excuse.” – Paul Driessen


The US Department of Justice has a newly expanded Responsible Corporate Officers Doctrine (aka the Park Doctrine). It will likely be used more and more often, to hold corporate executives individually accountable for the actions of their employees, without requiring that the government prove the execs intended to break any laws – or even that senior managers were negligent or didn’t even know someone in the company was violating a law or rule.

Hillary Clinton, IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy and numerous other federal government officials are blessed beyond measure that the minimal standards of evidence and harsh penalties that go with them … all of which they routinely apply to American citizens … don’t apply to the overseers who keep us in line. In fact, very few laws or regulations apply to the lawmakers and regulators who concoct and impose them.


Who is guarding the (dictatorial) guards?

Regulators mete out fines and stymie growth, but are rarely punished for their own misconduct

By Paul Driessen

Several years ago, Wells Fargo Bank discovered that employees had boosted sales by opening some 2 million deposit and credit card accounts without customer knowledge or authorization. Over the next few years, the bank fired more than 5,000 employees for misconduct and reimbursed customers $2.6 million in fees that they may have incurred on the bogus accounts.

Insufficient response and retribution, regulators and politicians howled. They played no role in uncovering the fraud, but they are hounding bank officials and demanding $185 million in fines.

In another action, the Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Trade Commission and State of California agreed to a $14.7 billion settlement with Volkswagen, to compensate 482,000 buyers who bought diesel cars that the company illegally made appear less polluting than they actually were.

“This settlement shows that EPA is committed to upholding standards to protect public health, enforce the law and protect clean air,” said Administrator Gina McCarthy. But it’s just a “partial settlement,” a “first step” in holding VW accountable for breaching “the public’s trust,” added DOJ Deputy AG Sally Yates.

Meanwhile, Ms. Yates wants prosecutors to employ the Responsible Corporate Officers Doctrine (or Park Doctrine) more often, to hold executives individually accountable for the actions of company employees, without requiring that the government prove the execs intended to break any laws – or even that senior managers were negligent or didn’t even know someone in the company was violating a law.

Hillary Clinton is incredibly lucky

Hillary Clinton is incredibly lucky the Park Doctrine doesn’t apply to her. Just imagine FBI Director James Comey’s dilemma if he couldn’t use the “no intent to violate the law” excuse. In fact, countless government officials – including Ms. McCarthy and IRS Commissioner John Koskinen – are blessed beyond measure that standards they routinely use against American citizens don’t apply to them. In fact, very few laws or regulations apply to the lawmakers and regulators who concoct and impose them.

No one should be victimized by corporate fraud, negligence or incompetence. But neither should they be victimized by negligent, incompetent or criminal actions of government agencies and bureaucrats, or of third parties they hire to validate their policies and agendas. Those actions also breach the public trust.

Equally fundamental and essential, policies and rules that affect our livelihoods, living standards and liberties must be based on honesty, accountability, evenhanded application, and verifiable evidence.

Those basic guidelines are patently ignored today, as countless examples demonstrate beyond doubt.

IRS repeatedly abused its power

The IRS repeatedly abused its power in targeting conservative groups. But then Lois Lerner’s emails mysteriously disappeared, she took the Fifth and retired with full pension, “two employees on the night shift” deleted the email backup tapes (with no repercussions) and Mr. Koskinen steadfastly refuses to cooperate with congressional investigators. No Park Doctrine for any of them.

Abuses are rampant throughout federal, state and local governments, as news accounts constantly attest. Incompetence, fraud and public trust violations just in the environmental arena are mind-numbing.

EPA Whitewash

On August 5, 2015, an EPA-hired crew negligently reopened the Gold King Mine above Silverton, Colorado and unleashed a 3,000,000-gallon toxic flash flood that contaminated rivers all the way to Lake Powell in Utah. EPA waited an entire day before notifying the public, offered apologies but only minimal compensation, refused to fire, fine or demote anyone – and issued a report that whitewashed the agency’s incompetence and even scrubbed the names of EPA on-site coordinator Hayes Griswold and his team.

But it’s on the regulatory front that the duplicity, exaggeration, fabrication and betrayal of our public trust are really outrageous – and used to amass more power and control over our energy, economy, job creation and living standards, close down companies and industries that regulators detest, and advance crony corporatist deals with favored entities, regardless of costs or impacts on jobs, health and welfare.

US cars have reduced tailpipe pollutants by 99%

EPA is determined to make our air not merely safe or healthy, but pristine, with no human pollutants. Since 1970, US cars have reduced tailpipe pollutants by 99% and coal-fired power plants have eliminated 92% of their particulate, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions. That’s still not enough, says EPA.

To promote its claim that any soot and dust particles are deadly, the agency employs “epidemiological” studies that attempt to link slightly higher death and pollution rates in different locales – and attribute the difference to man-made particulates. However, it is impossible to distinguish health effects due to vehicle, refinery or power plant pollutants from scores of natural pollutants, or to tell whether a death was caused by pollution or by bacteria, obesity, smoking, diabetes or countless other factors.

EPA employed illegal experiments on people

So to augment its baseless claims, EPA employed illegal experiments on people. But even when its human guinea pigs breathed up to 30 times more particulates than the agency insists are lethal, no one died. Apparently, air pollutants are a health hazard when they come from cars, refineries or coal-fired power plants – but not when they are administered in massive quantities by researchers hired by EPA.

EPA gets away with this by having activist groups posing as scientific bodies rubber stamp its pseudo-science. Since 2000, it has paid the American Lung Association more than $25 million, given its “independent” Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee members over $181 million, and let CASAC deny membership to industry or other experts who might question EPA findings.

EPA wants to regulate all ponds, puddles, creeks, ditches

EPA also wants to regulate all ponds, puddles, creeks, ditches and other “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) that are even remotely connected to a navigable waterway. That way it can control nearly all land uses and family, farm and industrial activities in the USA – based on equally specious “science” regarding supposedly dangerous pollutants that might get into drinking water or wildlife habitats.

EPA agenda overrides science and ethics

The junk science really goes into hyperdrive on climate change. Of course, it’s not just EPA. Virtually every Executive Branch agency has been enlisted in President Obama’s campaign to use “dangerous manmade climate change” to justify fundamentally transforming our nation’s energy, economic, legal and constitutional systems: from NASA and NOAA, to Agriculture and Interior, and even the Defense Department and Securities and Exchange Commission. The agenda overrides science and ethics.

EPA’s 54.5 mpg dictate for vehicles will force millions into smaller, lighter, plasticized cars that will not survive collisions with walls, trees, trucks and buses – causing thousands more serious injuries and deaths every year. That human toll is ignored in the agency’s “social cost of carbon” reports. So are the absence of hurricanes hitting the US mainland for 11 years, no rise in average global temperatures for 18 years, followed by a couple tenths of a degree since then, and the barely seven inches per century in Real World sea level rise, contrary to climate models and White House, EPA, IPCC and Al Gore assertions.

Hobbling the US economy

Equally absurd, these regulators are hobbling the US economy, while China, India and other developing nations produce and use increasing amounts of oil, natural gas and coal every year. Perhaps worse:

Federal regulations cost US businesses and families $1.9 trillion per year – with EPA alone accounting for $353 billion of that. This is a major reason for America’s anemic 1.1% annual economic growth and its worst labor participation rate in decades. As always, poor and minority families are hit hardest. And far too many of these regulations and costs are based on questionable, fabricated, even fraudulent science.

To top it off, illegal, unethical collusion has also become rampant at EPA: in sue and settle lawsuits, Alaska’s Pebble Mine permits, the Clean Power Plan, and helping climate activists with fund raising.

If these actions were committed by a private corporation, EPA and Justice Department SWAT teams would come after its executives, with no intent, negligence or knowledge required. But Ms. McCarthy and her staff have not been held to any such Park Doctrine standards – at least not yet.

Perhaps that explains why so many DC insiders are outraged (and maybe quaking in their boots) over the prospect that an unpredictable Washington outsider might become the next US sheriff.

Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org), and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power – Black death and other books on the environment.

 


10 thoughts on “Who is guarding the (dictatorial) guards?

    • The most corrupt couple that ever invaded Washington! That’s what happened. They have a long record of ugliness. Fiddlin

  1. Hilary’s protector, FBI Director Comiy had no legal basis for his claim of “No Intent”. The law was written with teeth because of the absolute necessity to keep documents Confidential and protected. Intent is not excuse and under the law neither is being hectically unsophisticated and neither is sloppiness or forgetfulness, ignorance or stupidity.

    The law was written to protect our nations secretes and be able to capture those who would infiltrate the nation and try to gather secretes. Much like the Islamic Administration we now have in place in many key positions.

    People do not understand the NWO is ready to pounce on America and tare down her Constitution and basic fundamental rights. The CFR Hilary is part of seeks to end our borders, infuse massive numbers of immigrants to eliminate national pride and national identity. OUR nation is stopping the NWO from putting the finals pieces in place so that they can launch a new World Constitution, written in 1979 and ratified via UN membership nations back in 1994. WSPA is simply waiting for the right time to launch the replacement Constitution. Hilary, Georg Soros, The Illuminati are all hell bent on doing this to America. And this is why it is likely Trump will not win. Hilary is the ruthless leader needed to make Americans bow to the NWO’s demands. If Hilary wins this IS the Last election that either side could win on election day. From this point forward it will be a Dictatorship and that will come to fruition when the New Constitution is put in place.

    You think I’m a conspiracy theorist? Watch and see.

  2. Snowfall blankets N China’s Arxan City 2016/9/27
    http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1008616.shtml
    http://www.globaltimes.cn/Portals/0//attachment/2016/2016-09-27/60f1395f-035f-47d5-a662-aac64f695d54.jpg
    This aerial photo taken on Sept. 27, 2016 shows the Arxan City after snowfall in north China’s Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Arxan City greeted the first snow of this year on Monday night. (Xinhua/Lian Zhen)
    http://www.globaltimes.cn/Portals/0//attachment/2016/2016-09-27/4714c0d1-1caa-40d5-bd41-e33cd2fab438.jpg
    A train stops on rail in Arxan City in north China’s Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Sept. 27, 2016. Arxan City greeted the first snow of this year on Monday night. (Xinhua/Lian Zhen)
    http://www.globaltimes.cn/Portals/0//attachment/2016/2016-09-27/a0f3cb13-16ec-49ff-8b8d-4b72adf6e948.jpg
    A citizen rides on a street in Arxan City in north China’s Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Sept. 27, 2016. Arxan City greeted the first snow of this year on Monday night. (Xinhua/Lian Zhen)
    http://www.globaltimes.cn/Portals/0//attachment/2016/2016-09-27/c61c58f1-8b53-45c5-81f1-4c61bba6a96a.jpg
    Photo taken on Sept. 27, 2016 shows the Arxan City after snowfall in north China’s Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Arxan City greeted the first snow of this year on Monday night. (Xinhua/Lian Zhen
    Reader’s comment: Snow is early this year, considering the Arxan climate: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arxan

  3. What Comey said; Hillary had no intent when she violated nearly every regulation, statute and law concerning the handling and safeguarding of classified materials.

    What Comey meant; Hillary is a member of America’s protected class and laws do not pertain to her…

  4. For the last 20 years, many legal scholars have noted that federal criminal laws had removed the need to prove intent.
    Most white collar criminal actions have not even tried to use intent – federal statutes eliminated that basic requirement.
    Comey knows this as he has prosecuted many people over the years.
    It was a made up excuse, and the MSM was primed and ready to run with it.

  5. My understanding of all of it is! If Hillary was prosecuted it would have taken down some 400 people with her, this would have lead to additional people just months after that being charged with crimes acting against the United States.

  6. Actually, it’s not “impossible to tell whether a death was caused by pollution or by bacteria, obesity, smoking, diabetes or countless other factors.”

    I spent 15+ years working in public health where my main responsibility was analyzing death certificate data. EVERY death certificate issued (in the US at least) is required to have listed the “underlying cause of death” – and data on leading causes of death and death rates by cause are available for the US (through NSPS – part of CDC), for states and local communities such as counties and major cities (through NSPS and also state and/or local health departments.

    In add that time, analyzing leading causes of death … I have never once see a cause of death listed as “pollution” or “obesity” or “smoking: … although it’s possible in some cases those might be contributing to the underlying cause of death and there are studies that make estimates of those.

    Routinely you can get the number of deaths and death rates for various diseases (including heart disease, cancer, strokes, influenza and pneumonia, HIV, and other disease caused by a range of microorganisms).

    Deaths due to injuries (with breakdowns to the cause of injury, such as motor vehicle crashes, falls, suicide, homicide, etc.) are also widely available. If you go to the CDC website you’ll find a database called “WISQARS” (I may have mispelt, but look for injury statistics) and you’ll be able to pull the data yourself.

    There are some cases where the attending doctor could not tell what caused death (usually in cases that might have been homicide, suicide or an accidental injury) or the person was “unattended” at the time of death… for example a homeless person, and those deaths would be classified as having an “undetermined” cause of death.

    It’s also somewhat more difficult to identify deaths due to some of the chronic diseases, and common disease such as lung cancer can be identified… but not usually whether or not the lung cancer was due to smoking. You will see epidemiological studies however estimating those. Also CDC now has prevalence data on the most common chronic diseases, including deaths.

    The reason it’s so much harder to get data on deaths due to what I call “negative” information such as obesity, smoking, alcohol abuse and some types drug use, etc. is that people often hide that information (especially if the substance is illegal)…

    However, it is possible to get death data from death certificates on a wide range of drugs (including unintentional deaths from prescription drugs) if that is what the doctor noted was the underlying cause of death. I should mention however, that all the injury death data is based on what the external cause of death is… so for example, if you had a car crash and suffered a traumatic brain injury and died.. the underlying cause of death certificate will say you died from a car crash but will not have information that it was a TBI.

    Just sayin’!

Comments are closed.