The world needs more energy!

Poor countries have a right to use fossil fuels and will no longer let anyone stop us

In this article,  young Ugandan Steven Lyazi asks that African and global leaders do much more to make fossil fuels and electricity available for poor families, nations and communities around the world. Only in that way, he convincingly argues, can the world’s poor improve their lives, living standards, health and life spans.

The world needs more energy!

Poor countries have a right to use fossil fuels and will no longer let anyone stop us
By Steven Lyazi

Our planet is blessed with abundant resources that can generate enormous energy, provide raw materials for wondrous technologies, and build modern homes, roads and other structures – to support every man, woman and child on this earth. But can and will political powers make them available to the people who need them?

Of all these resources, energy is the most important. Nothing happens without energy.

For most of mankind’s history, human or animal muscle, wood and animal dung, water power, and plant or animal oil provided our energy. But the amount and quality of that energy was limited, and therefore what people could do was also limited.

Then, almost suddenly, people began using coal, and then oil, natural gas, hydroelectric and nuclear power. Our abilities, and our dreams, began to reach for the heavens – at least in many countries. Sadly, many other countries lagged far behind, and many still do.

They are held back, condemned to continued energy poverty – and thus to real poverty and the diseases, malnutrition and desperation that go with that absence of modern energy. This is partly because many nations are governed by incompetent, corrupt leaders, who care only about enriching themselves, their families, and their close friends, allies and supporters.

But it is also because callous, imperialistic people in rich countries use exaggerated, imaginary or phony environmental concerns and fake disasters to justify laws, regulations and excuses not to let poor countries use fossil fuels or nuclear power or develop their economies.

They tell us we should only use renewable energy. They say nuclear power is dangerous, and oil, gas and coal are dirty and cause dangerous climate change. They don’t seem to think or care about the poverty, diseases and starvation that we suffer because we do not have fossil fuels.

And when they talk about renewable energy, they mean the very limited energy – and economic growth – that come from wind and solar power, or from growing crops for energy instead of to feed our hungry people. They even oppose hydroelectric power for poor nations.

They are rich and well fed, enjoying amazing homes and jobs and technologies in their modern countries. But they tell us poor Africans (and other people) that we must limit our energy and dreams to whatever can come from expensive, insufficient kinds of energies to serve our large and growing populations. This is greedy and selfish, the kind of attitude of people who only think of themselves.

Yes, they use renewable energy, but only a little. Almost all their energy still comes from oil, gas, coal, nuclear and hydro power. Only a tiny amount comes from wind, solar or biofuels – that they say should be our only sources of energy.

They have money and power, and they can influence what happens to us. But they are causing massive poverty, disease, starvation and death in third world countries.

I support clean energy and don’t want to see dangerous global warming. I agree that everyone should help ensure that we live in a clean environment. Everyone wants that, and to see their children and grandchildren living in a clean environment.

But that does not mean we should accept more poverty. It does not mean these rich, powerful people should be able to take away our right to live. It does not mean they have a right to put make-believe scare stories in our papers, on our televisions and radios, and on the internet.

It does not mean they should invent claims that our planet is boiling and we are causing droughts and floods – and so we should throw away coal and other cheap energies that we need to survive.

Maybe they are right, and humans are warming the earth or changing the climate – a little. But our weather and climate have always changed, and the world was even warmer during the dinosaur era than it is today, and much colder during the ice ages, with no human activities. Climate change has been going on for millions of years ago, but that doesn’t mean today’s changes are because of humans or will be disasters.

Environmental agencies and groups say the world is changing and try to tell us what to do to prevent these changes, which they say will all be bad. But getting rid of poverty and disease is also a big change that would be good for all of us, and cannot happen without fossil fuels.

We’ve all been scared to death by horror movies, especially films that are just plausible enough to make us think it could happen. But when these movies (or computer models) are used to scare us away from fossil fuels, that is wrong and we should not be frightened.

What these rich country movie actors, politicians, regulators, scientists and activists forget is that our planet and environment have existed for millions of years, have changed over and over, and will continue to exist either with or without human interference. But we humans have to live here too.

Denying people their right to use fossil fuels is the worst thing someone can do to a fellow human. Western powers developed massively due to cheap fossil fuels and today live like kings. They have no right to deny their living standards to people in developing countries.

Who invented the terms “developing countries” or “third world countries” anyway”? All countries have been developing at some point. In fact, they are always still developing, all the time.

The only wrong interpretation is to say “third world countries” do not have a God-given right to use all their energy, minerals and other resources to develop themselves, and get rich, create good jobs for their people, end poverty and disease, and grow enough food to make everyone well fed and healthy.

In fact, here is a thought for all African leaders: A collective mindset supporting development will make Africa as great as any other region on earth. We all just need to unite around this idea.

The recent United States elections disappointed many people, but made many others happy. To me, they may be a very good thing. They might mean the new President Trump will be a good leader for the entire world. He might make more people question these claims that fossil fuels cause dangerous global warming – and encourage everyone to use more oil, gas and coal to improve our lives, until smart people someday discover different energy sources that really do work.

We all desire to be healthy and live better lives, just like people in developed countries. Yes, we have had greedy, selfish leaders in the past who might have contributed to our status today. But we can and must learn from our mistakes, and Mr. Trump wants to correct his and Mr. Obama’s mistakes.

African and other countries need abundant energy for economic growth. They need all kinds of energy, especially fossil fuels, to become modern and make people’s lives better.

Anyone who tries to prevent us from using these energy resources is denying us our right to improve our lives, and even our right to live, which is the most fundamental right of any human. That is wrong and immoral, and we will no longer tolerate it.


Steven Lyazi is a student and worker in Kampala, Uganda. He served as special assistant to Congress of Racial Equality-Uganda director Cyril Boynes, until Mr. Boynes’ death in January 2015.



11 thoughts on “The world needs more energy!”

  1. In Moscow are expected heavy snowfall and blizzard.
    MOSCOW, December 3. / TASS /. Forecasters warned of worsening weather in the beginning of next week. According to preliminary estimates, on Monday, 5 December are expected heavy snow and blowing snow, said in Roshydromet.
    “Will rise southwest wind up to 7-12 m / s, to snow the morning of Tuesday, could fall up to 12 mm of rain, which is more than 20% of monthly norm, which in December is 56 mm.”, – Said the representative of the Met Office, noting, that the probability of rain – 74%.
    The snow will come, and all the days that followed. During the first days of December, the city has already fallen about 10% of the monthly norm.
    Weather in Moscow defines the North Atlantic cyclone – in the city came to a beautiful winter with large, soft flakes of snow. The height of snow drifts on the main weather station of the capital – ENEA – is 15 cm, 16 cm recorded in Nemchinovka, and in the city center – on the Baltschug – 8 cm.
    As expected, next week will add about 30 cm snow.

  2. Well written. More energy does mean less poverty. It is the advancement of improvement of everything human.This is what should be taught in every school. It is a human right.


  3. December 2016, all weather weather forecast predicted the advent of a rigid climate for Russia. Scientists of half World, especially where the cold is also a problem for survival, had announced that the Winter (from them) would be cold, and we talk about Ukraine, Russia, England, eastern USA.
    In the video, the record frost in Siberia, the Urals up in November 2016. Event of which have given wide coverage all mass media of Russia.
    -‘Another warning that we’re not in the hottest year ever!
    It’s a cold warning! The cold will double!’

  4. Most of these so called poor countries are African countries and their biggest problem is their own government’s and replace these people with someone that really cares and will not line their own pockets and swiss bank accounts with billions of their money.
    Yes the rich live a life of opulence while telling the rest of us we need to give up everything we worked for, but they keep theirs.
    Think there is something wrong with this picture?

  5. Perhaps, Mr. Trump will allow LENR technology to become a household usage? It would help put a dent into the lobby’s and monopolies across the globe!
    There are more than just LENR technologies out there. Loosening up the restrictions on just one non-grid technology would have a profound effect on those whom are afraid physically or possible career loss to come out of the closet with even more off-grid technology. Anti-trust at it’s best eh.

  6. Wishing you best success!

    Don’t fall for “free energy” claims by purveyors of windmills, solar panels, or limit-less “biofuel” (from cutting down your forests).

  7. More energy means a higher standard of living, and not being totally at the whims of nature. It means control over out destiny. And it means time to pursue REAL renewable and alternative energy, not just solar and windmills (remember Don Quixote?), real alternatives being Thorium nuclear power, geothermal, and possibly some form of nuclear fusion, or something else, as yet still lurking in out in left field. Whatever real alternatives are available won’t be developed if the worlds lapses into the state of stagnation envisioned by opponents of fossil fuels.

  8. Believers in scripture are told to “Pray their flight be not in winter”. The weather is transitioning. This may be a sign to which one must pay attention.

  9. Wow! Just wow my feeling exactly just so well said.

    This deserves a much wider audience, of course non of our main stream media channel will touch this.

  10. “But it was also clear that an all-round increase in wealth threatened the destruction—indeed, in some sense was the destruction—of a hierarchical society. In a world in which everyone worked short hours, had enough to eat, lived in a house with a bathroom and a refrigerator, and possessed a motor-car or even an aeroplane, the most obvious and perhaps the most important form of inequality would already have disappeared. If it once became general, wealth would confer no distinction. It was possible, no doubt, to imagine a society in which wealth, in the sense of personal possessions and luxuries, should be evenly distributed, while power remained in the hands of a small privileged caste. But in practice such a society could not long remain stable. For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later realise that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it away. In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on a basis of poverty and ignorance.”
    ― George Orwell, 1984

Comments are closed.